Hearing Screening Among Underserved US Adults: A Scoping Review of Modalities and Determinants

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate existing literature on hearing screening outcomes and follow‐through among the adult population in the US. Data Sources PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Review Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies published from January 2000 to January 2026. Inclusion criteria targeted studies assessing hearing screening strategies for underserved adults in the US. Studies were categorized based on their focus, including describing a screening modality, analyzing the facilitators/barriers to screening, or both. Results Of 5826 articles screened, 33 met the inclusion criteria. Articles on screening modalities included provider‐administered questionnaires, audiology device‐assisted tests, self‐reported single‐item screening questions, community health worker (CHW)‐led/community‐based approaches, and survey‐based assessments. The utilization of each screening modality varied by population, setting, and feasibility. In the community setting, questionnaires and CHW‐led or culturally tailored approaches were the most common methods of administering hearing screening. Cost, stigma, and education presented barriers, while primary care workflow integration and provider encouragement emerged as facilitators. Conclusion A variety of modalities are being utilized to conduct hearing screening for adult populations. The feasibility of implementation varies by study setting and is supported by facilitators including integration into primary care, encouragement by providers, and patient education. In order to improve the rates of hearing screening among all communities, including those that are underserved, it is important to acknowledge both the barriers and facilitators to screening. Consistent guidelines, a focus on implementation, and partnerships across providers will be most beneficial in this pursuit. Level of Evidence N/A.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70915
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hearing Screening Among Underserved US Adults: A Scoping Review of Modalities and Determinants

Yew Song Cheng, Komal Aggarwal, Sarah Hughes, Leyda Marrero‐Morales et al.
The Laryngoscope
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Hearing Screening Among Underserved US Adults: A Scoping Review of Modalities and Determinants

Yew Song Cheng, Komal Aggarwal, Sarah Hughes, Leyda Marrero‐Morales, Megan L. Durr, Kashika Bharol, Kyle Polen, Armita Norouzi, Kunal Kapoor
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate existing literature on hearing screening outcomes and follow‐through among the adult population in the US. Data Sources PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Review Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies published from January 2000 to January 2026. Inclusion criteria targeted studies assessing hearing screening strategies for underserved adults in the US. Studies were categorized based on their focus, including describing a screening modality, analyzing the facilitators/barriers to screening, or both. Results Of 5826 articles screened, 33 met the inclusion criteria. Articles on screening modalities included provider‐administered questionnaires, audiology device‐assisted tests, self‐reported single‐item screening questions, community health worker (CHW)‐led/community‐based approaches, and survey‐based assessments. The utilization of each screening modality varied by population, setting, and feasibility. In the community setting, questionnaires and CHW‐led or culturally tailored approaches were the most common methods of administering hearing screening. Cost, stigma, and education presented barriers, while primary care workflow integration and provider encouragement emerged as facilitators. Conclusion A variety of modalities are being utilized to conduct hearing screening for adult populations. The feasibility of implementation varies by study setting and is supported by facilitators including integration into primary care, encouragement by providers, and patient education. In order to improve the rates of hearing screening among all communities, including those that are underserved, it is important to acknowledge both the barriers and facilitators to screening. Consistent guidelines, a focus on implementation, and partnerships across providers will be most beneficial in this pursuit. Level of Evidence N/A.

The Laryngoscope
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.