Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir versus Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C on Haemodialysis: A Multicentre, Single-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis are at risk of hepatitis C virus exposure due to nosocomial transmission and the duration of hemodialysis. The treatment for hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis is oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, which works directly as an antiviral. Currently, the DAA considered safe for use in patients with chronic kidney disease is grazoprevir/elbasvir. However, this DAA is expensive and effective in patients with genotypes 1 and 4. Recent studies have shown that sofosbuvir-based regimens are safe. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir with grazoprevir/elbasvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing hemodialysis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized clinical trial that included 120 treatment-naïve, HCV-infected hemodialysis patients. We randomized only participants with fibrosis < F4. Patients with cirrhosis (F4) were assigned to sofosbuvir/daclatasvir per guideline-based contraindications for grazoprevir/elbasvir. Participants received sofosbuvir/daclatasvir or grazoprevir/elbasvir. The primary endpoints were sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) and treatment-related adverse events. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Results: 120 patients completed the study, with no dropouts or missing SVR12 data. All patients (100%) achieved SVR12 in both treatment groups. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir and grazoprevir/elbasvir achieved 100% SVR at 12 weeks, with good safety and no adverse events in 98.3% of patients. Conclusion: Both sofosbuvir/daclatasvir and grazoprevir/elbasvir are highly effective and safe for treating hepatitis C in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir offers broader applicability across all fibrosis stages and genotypes, with substantially lower treatment costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta medica Indonesiana
Published
2026-10-07
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir versus Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C on Haemodialysis: A Multicentre, Single-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Muhammad Begawan Bestari, Desti Rachmani, Triyanta Yuli Pramana, Pringgodigdo Nugroho et al.
Acta medica Indonesiana
Hepatitis C virus research
article

Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir versus Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C on Haemodialysis: A Multicentre, Single-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Muhammad Begawan Bestari, Desti Rachmani, Triyanta Yuli Pramana, Pringgodigdo Nugroho, Afiatin Afiatin, Hery Djagat Purnomo, Fardhah Akil, Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman, Agung Susanto, Dwi Lestari, Akhyar Albaar, Lawrence Ho Khek-Yu
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis are at risk of hepatitis C virus exposure due to nosocomial transmission and the duration of hemodialysis. The treatment for hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis is oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, which works directly as an antiviral. Currently, the DAA considered safe for use in patients with chronic kidney disease is grazoprevir/elbasvir. However, this DAA is expensive and effective in patients with genotypes 1 and 4. Recent studies have shown that sofosbuvir-based regimens are safe. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir with grazoprevir/elbasvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing hemodialysis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized clinical trial that included 120 treatment-naïve, HCV-infected hemodialysis patients. We randomized only participants with fibrosis < F4. Patients with cirrhosis (F4) were assigned to sofosbuvir/daclatasvir per guideline-based contraindications for grazoprevir/elbasvir. Participants received sofosbuvir/daclatasvir or grazoprevir/elbasvir. The primary endpoints were sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) and treatment-related adverse events. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Results: 120 patients completed the study, with no dropouts or missing SVR12 data. All patients (100%) achieved SVR12 in both treatment groups. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir and grazoprevir/elbasvir achieved 100% SVR at 12 weeks, with good safety and no adverse events in 98.3% of patients. Conclusion: Both sofosbuvir/daclatasvir and grazoprevir/elbasvir are highly effective and safe for treating hepatitis C in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir offers broader applicability across all fibrosis stages and genotypes, with substantially lower treatment costs.

Acta medica Indonesiana
National University of Singapore (SG), Dr. Kariadi Hospital (ID), Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.