Mind the gap: capability, policy and uncertainty in the adoption of generative AI within post-compulsory education

This qualitative, interpretivist study explores perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) adoption among academic staff and Level 7 senior leader apprentices within a UK business school. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with sixteen participants, inductive thematic analysis revealed three interrelated themes: engagement under uncertainty, the capability gap, and the policy gap. Findings indicate that whilst participants recognise the potential utility associated with embracing GenAI, adoption is constrained by ethical sensitivity, limited application literacy, and the opacity of governance frameworks across the tripartite apprenticeship relationship. This study contributes to emergent debates on AI literacy and technological acceptance by surfacing how uncertainty is socially and structurally produced, offering practical recommendations for education providers seeking to embed GenAI both effectively and ethically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Post-Compulsory Education
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2026.2739104
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the gap: capability, policy and uncertainty in the adoption of generative AI within post-compulsory education

Chris Taylor, Naomi Davis-Crane, Paul Lees
Research in Post-Compulsory Education
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Mind the gap: capability, policy and uncertainty in the adoption of generative AI within post-compulsory education

Chris Taylor, Naomi Davis-Crane, Paul Lees
article en

Abstract

This qualitative, interpretivist study explores perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) adoption among academic staff and Level 7 senior leader apprentices within a UK business school. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with sixteen participants, inductive thematic analysis revealed three interrelated themes: engagement under uncertainty, the capability gap, and the policy gap. Findings indicate that whilst participants recognise the potential utility associated with embracing GenAI, adoption is constrained by ethical sensitivity, limited application literacy, and the opacity of governance frameworks across the tripartite apprenticeship relationship. This study contributes to emergent debates on AI literacy and technological acceptance by surfacing how uncertainty is socially and structurally produced, offering practical recommendations for education providers seeking to embed GenAI both effectively and ethically.

Research in Post-Compulsory Education
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mind the gap: capability, policy and uncertainty in the adoption of generative AI within post-compulsory education — Chris Taylor, Naomi Davis-Crane, et al. · Research in Post-Compulsory Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS