Comparing the Efficacy of Negative-Pressure Ventilation to Noninvasive, Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure

Background: Negative-pressure ventilation (NPV) avoids a positive-pressure facial interface, but contemporary multi-center pediatric data comparing NPV with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV) are limited. We describe modern NPV epidemiology and compare outcomes with NIV in children younger than 3 years with acute respiratory failure. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study using the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS) database. Children younger than 3 years who received NPV or NIV during a pediatric ICU (PICU) admission for acute or acute-on-chronic respiratory failure were included; outpatient use of either modality was excluded. Subjects were categorized according to initial respiratory support modality. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation after initiation of noninvasive respiratory support. The primary analysis used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression with center included as a random intercept. Propensity-score matching using Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, age, sex, weight, diagnostic variables, and center was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Crude intubation rates were higher in the NPV group than in the NIV group (27.3% vs 10.4%, P < .001). After adjustment for measured subject-level factors and center-level clustering, ventilation modality was not independently associated with intubation (NIV vs NPV adjusted OR 0.675, 95% CI 0.393–1.158, P = .154). In the propensity-score-matched cohort, intubation remained numerically higher in the NPV group but was not statistically significant (NPV vs NIV OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.92–2.93, P = .12). Conclusions: In this multi-center retrospective cohort, NPV was used in a small minority of children younger than 3 years with acute respiratory failure. After adjustment for measured confounders and center-level clustering, ventilation modality was not independently associated with intubation. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal patient selection and the role of NPV in pediatric acute respiratory failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654261486084
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Efficacy of Negative-Pressure Ventilation to Noninvasive, Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure

Ryan K. Breuer, Noah Stanco, Syeda Zabreen Afzal, Amanda Hassinger et al.
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Comparing the Efficacy of Negative-Pressure Ventilation to Noninvasive, Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure

Ryan K. Breuer, Noah Stanco, Syeda Zabreen Afzal, Amanda Hassinger, Brian Wrotniak, Robert Welliver
article en

Abstract

Background: Negative-pressure ventilation (NPV) avoids a positive-pressure facial interface, but contemporary multi-center pediatric data comparing NPV with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV) are limited. We describe modern NPV epidemiology and compare outcomes with NIV in children younger than 3 years with acute respiratory failure. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study using the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS) database. Children younger than 3 years who received NPV or NIV during a pediatric ICU (PICU) admission for acute or acute-on-chronic respiratory failure were included; outpatient use of either modality was excluded. Subjects were categorized according to initial respiratory support modality. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation after initiation of noninvasive respiratory support. The primary analysis used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression with center included as a random intercept. Propensity-score matching using Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, age, sex, weight, diagnostic variables, and center was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Crude intubation rates were higher in the NPV group than in the NIV group (27.3% vs 10.4%, P < .001). After adjustment for measured subject-level factors and center-level clustering, ventilation modality was not independently associated with intubation (NIV vs NPV adjusted OR 0.675, 95% CI 0.393–1.158, P = .154). In the propensity-score-matched cohort, intubation remained numerically higher in the NPV group but was not statistically significant (NPV vs NIV OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.92–2.93, P = .12). Conclusions: In this multi-center retrospective cohort, NPV was used in a small minority of children younger than 3 years with acute respiratory failure. After adjustment for measured confounders and center-level clustering, ventilation modality was not independently associated with intubation. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal patient selection and the role of NPV in pediatric acute respiratory failure.

Respiratory Care
Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.