Outcomes and diagnostic yield of paediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: implications for patient selection, benchmarking and quality standards

Objective To report updated diagnostic yield in children undergoing first diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, compared with previous periods reflecting earlier routine practice and during COVID-19 pandemic-related service restrictions. Secondary aims were to study clinical and laboratory predictive factors for abnormal paediatric endoscopy and to consider their implications for patient selection, benchmarking and quality standards. Design Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all first-diagnostic endoscopies performed in a tertiary paediatric gastroenterology service across three 6-month cohorts: Period 1—historic routine practice; Period 2—during COVID-19 pandemic and Period 3—contemporary routine practice. Assessment of endoscopic findings and preceding clinical and laboratory factors for sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value. Primary outcome Diagnostic yield defined as the % of patients with histological abnormality confirmed in our weekly histology multidisciplinary team meeting. Secondary outcome Macroscopic and histological findings on endoscopy and presenting clinical and laboratory measures. Results During Period 2, yield reached 89% for oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and ileocolonoscopy. In Period 3, there were 194 procedures in 137 children. Period 3 histological abnormality rates were significantly higher than Period 1: 66.4% versus 36% overall; 61.3% versus 28% for OGD; 54.9% versus 16% for OGD alone (in patients with normal anti-transglutaminase IgA antibody); 75% versus 47% for OGD and ileocolonoscopy. Period 3 unexpectedly demonstrated a significant increase in diagnoses of histological gastritis. Conclusions Refined patient selection can reduce the proportion of normal procedures, with no observed evidence of harm. These data can contribute towards benchmarking and development of quality standards for paediatric diagnostic endoscopy services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontline Gastroenterology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2026-103869
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes and diagnostic yield of paediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: implications for patient selection, benchmarking and quality standards

Marco Gasparetto, Sandhia Naik, Croft Nick, Luis Beltrán et al.
Frontline Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Outcomes and diagnostic yield of paediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: implications for patient selection, benchmarking and quality standards

Marco Gasparetto, Sandhia Naik, Croft Nick, Luis Beltrán, Joseph Machta, Protima Deb, D Rawat, Ahmed Kadir, Joanne Chinaleong
article en

Abstract

Objective To report updated diagnostic yield in children undergoing first diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, compared with previous periods reflecting earlier routine practice and during COVID-19 pandemic-related service restrictions. Secondary aims were to study clinical and laboratory predictive factors for abnormal paediatric endoscopy and to consider their implications for patient selection, benchmarking and quality standards. Design Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all first-diagnostic endoscopies performed in a tertiary paediatric gastroenterology service across three 6-month cohorts: Period 1—historic routine practice; Period 2—during COVID-19 pandemic and Period 3—contemporary routine practice. Assessment of endoscopic findings and preceding clinical and laboratory factors for sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value. Primary outcome Diagnostic yield defined as the % of patients with histological abnormality confirmed in our weekly histology multidisciplinary team meeting. Secondary outcome Macroscopic and histological findings on endoscopy and presenting clinical and laboratory measures. Results During Period 2, yield reached 89% for oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and ileocolonoscopy. In Period 3, there were 194 procedures in 137 children. Period 3 histological abnormality rates were significantly higher than Period 1: 66.4% versus 36% overall; 61.3% versus 28% for OGD; 54.9% versus 16% for OGD alone (in patients with normal anti-transglutaminase IgA antibody); 75% versus 47% for OGD and ileocolonoscopy. Period 3 unexpectedly demonstrated a significant increase in diagnoses of histological gastritis. Conclusions Refined patient selection can reduce the proportion of normal procedures, with no observed evidence of harm. These data can contribute towards benchmarking and development of quality standards for paediatric diagnostic endoscopy services.

Frontline Gastroenterology
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB), Blizard Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.