The Formula of Humanity and Mistreatment of Migrants: Instrumentalization, Indifference, and Hostility

Abstract We argue that Kant’s Formula of Humanity (FH) should be expanded to provide a more nuanced analysis of complex real-world cases of mistreatment. Our specific focus is mistreatment of migrants. Migrants are not only mistreated due to their perceived instrumental value (as a mere means) but also by treating them as of no value (as a mere thing) or mistreating them due to perceived instrumental or intrinsic disvalue (as a mere threat). The well-known prohibition against instrumentalization must be supplemented by prohibitions against certain forms of indifference and certain forms of hostility. In our article, we outline these additional categories of mistreatment and explain how they relate to each other and to the prohibition against treatment as a mere means. Our goal is to show how these categories can account for a number of ethically significant phenomena that the FH as it stands does not explicitly cover.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kantian Review
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415426101551
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Formula of Humanity and Mistreatment of Migrants: Instrumentalization, Indifference, and Hostility

Martin Sticker, Corinna Mieth
Kantian Review
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

The Formula of Humanity and Mistreatment of Migrants: Instrumentalization, Indifference, and Hostility

Martin Sticker, Corinna Mieth
article en

Abstract

Abstract We argue that Kant’s Formula of Humanity (FH) should be expanded to provide a more nuanced analysis of complex real-world cases of mistreatment. Our specific focus is mistreatment of migrants. Migrants are not only mistreated due to their perceived instrumental value (as a mere means) but also by treating them as of no value (as a mere thing) or mistreating them due to perceived instrumental or intrinsic disvalue (as a mere threat). The well-known prohibition against instrumentalization must be supplemented by prohibitions against certain forms of indifference and certain forms of hostility. In our article, we outline these additional categories of mistreatment and explain how they relate to each other and to the prohibition against treatment as a mere means. Our goal is to show how these categories can account for a number of ethically significant phenomena that the FH as it stands does not explicitly cover.

Kantian Review
University of Bristol (GB), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.