Acute effects of 3 and 6 mg·Kg −1 caffeine on strength–power performance and isokinetic peak torque in competitive male boxers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial

Background Evidence on the dose, timing, and task specificity of caffeine ingestion in combat-sport athletes remains limited. This study examined the acute effects of 3 and 6 mg·kg−1 caffeine on strength–power performance and isokinetic peak torque in male boxers.Methods Fifteen male boxers who met the Chinese national second-class athlete standard or higher completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Each participant completed placebo (PLA), 3 mg·kg−1 caffeine (CAF3), and 6 mg·kg−1 caffeine (CAF6) conditions in randomized order, separated by a 1-week washout. Countermovement jump (CMJ), ballistic push-up (BPU), and dominant-side shoulder and knee isokinetic peak torque (PT) were assessed at baseline and during testing blocks beginning at 30 and 60 min post-ingestion. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, with Holm adjustment applied across the 10 planned condition × time interaction tests. Reliability analyzes were supportive, and threshold-based individual classifications were exploratory.Results Significant condition × time interactions were observed for CMJ, BPU, and isokinetic PT outcomes. During the scheduled 60-min assessment, CAF3 and CAF6 produced higher CMJ jump height, peak power, and relative peak power than PLA, with no significant difference between caffeine doses. For BPU, CAF6 produced higher concentric impulse, concentric mean power, and concentric peak power than PLA during the scheduled 60-min assessment, whereas CAF3 did not differ from PLA. Shoulder flexion and extension PT increased under caffeine conditions at selected time points, without a consistent dose advantage. Knee extension PT showed the clearest dose-specific response, with CAF6 exceeding both PLA and CAF3 during the scheduled 60-min assessment.Conclusions Acute ingestion of 3 and 6 mg·kg−1 caffeine was associated with improvements in selected laboratory-based strength–power and isokinetic PT outcomes in male boxers, particularly during the scheduled 60-min assessment. The pattern of responses varied across doses and testing tasks, and 6 mg·kg−1 was not consistently superior to 3 mg·kg−1. These findings should be interpreted as evidence for selected neuromuscular outcomes rather than as direct evidence of improved punching or competitive boxing performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2026.2743368
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute effects of 3 and 6 mg·Kg −1 caffeine on strength–power performance and isokinetic peak torque in competitive male boxers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial

Hao Wang, Zichen Zeng, Maiwulanjiang Tuerhongjiang, Ruidong Liu et al.
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Coffee research and impacts
article

Acute effects of 3 and 6 mg·Kg −1 caffeine on strength–power performance and isokinetic peak torque in competitive male boxers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial

Hao Wang, Zichen Zeng, Maiwulanjiang Tuerhongjiang, Ruidong Liu, Zhijie Yan
article en

Abstract

Background Evidence on the dose, timing, and task specificity of caffeine ingestion in combat-sport athletes remains limited. This study examined the acute effects of 3 and 6 mg·kg−1 caffeine on strength–power performance and isokinetic peak torque in male boxers.Methods Fifteen male boxers who met the Chinese national second-class athlete standard or higher completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Each participant completed placebo (PLA), 3 mg·kg−1 caffeine (CAF3), and 6 mg·kg−1 caffeine (CAF6) conditions in randomized order, separated by a 1-week washout. Countermovement jump (CMJ), ballistic push-up (BPU), and dominant-side shoulder and knee isokinetic peak torque (PT) were assessed at baseline and during testing blocks beginning at 30 and 60 min post-ingestion. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, with Holm adjustment applied across the 10 planned condition × time interaction tests. Reliability analyzes were supportive, and threshold-based individual classifications were exploratory.Results Significant condition × time interactions were observed for CMJ, BPU, and isokinetic PT outcomes. During the scheduled 60-min assessment, CAF3 and CAF6 produced higher CMJ jump height, peak power, and relative peak power than PLA, with no significant difference between caffeine doses. For BPU, CAF6 produced higher concentric impulse, concentric mean power, and concentric peak power than PLA during the scheduled 60-min assessment, whereas CAF3 did not differ from PLA. Shoulder flexion and extension PT increased under caffeine conditions at selected time points, without a consistent dose advantage. Knee extension PT showed the clearest dose-specific response, with CAF6 exceeding both PLA and CAF3 during the scheduled 60-min assessment.Conclusions Acute ingestion of 3 and 6 mg·kg−1 caffeine was associated with improvements in selected laboratory-based strength–power and isokinetic PT outcomes in male boxers, particularly during the scheduled 60-min assessment. The pattern of responses varied across doses and testing tasks, and 6 mg·kg−1 was not consistently superior to 3 mg·kg−1. These findings should be interpreted as evidence for selected neuromuscular outcomes rather than as direct evidence of improved punching or competitive boxing performance.

Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionVol. 23(1)
General Administration of Sport of China (CN), Beijing Sport University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.