Regional strain patterns in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Abstract Purpose Echocardiographic studies have shown that patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) exhibit altered regional contraction patterns. With cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of global and regional cardiac function, we aimed to quantify the regional contraction patterns of patients with MVP using CMR feature tracking (FT) strain analysis in comparison to a control group. Methods Of all patients who underwent CMR scans from 2013 to 2022 at our institution, 132 patients with MVP were identified and compared to 50 controls without any cardiac condition. CMR scans were performed on 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and CMR-FT strain analysis was performed on cine images using MEDIS QStrain 4.1. The primary endpoints were regional peak left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain values. Secondary endpoints included LV global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain and right ventricular (RV) free wall longitudinal strain. Differences between groups were assessed using linear regression models, adjusting for age and sex. Results Patients with MVP showed worse regional peak longitudinal strain compared to controls in the basal and part of the medial LV segments, especially in segments S1, S4, S6, S7, and S12. In contrast, the apical segments S13, S14, S15, and S16 showed better strain values. Additionally, LA reservoir strain was reduced in MVP patients. LV GCS, LV GLS, and RV free wall longitudinal strain were similar between both groups. Conclusion While patients with MVP showed preserved LV GCS and GLS compared to controls, LV regional longitudinal strain analysis showed impaired strain in the basal segments and increased strain in the apical segments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-03033-y
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional strain patterns in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Misael Estepa, Stefanie Maria Werhahn, Cyrill Meuwly, Natalia Solowjowa et al.
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Regional strain patterns in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Misael Estepa, Stefanie Maria Werhahn, Cyrill Meuwly, Natalia Solowjowa, Christian Stehning, Djawid Hashemi, Sebastian Kelle, Jeffrey Ji-Peng Li, Ann-Sophie Eggers, Ingo Hilgendorf, Annette Aigner, Frank Edelmann, Rebecca Beyer, Jennifer Erley, Patrick Doeblin, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, Christoph Klein, Shing Ching
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Echocardiographic studies have shown that patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) exhibit altered regional contraction patterns. With cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of global and regional cardiac function, we aimed to quantify the regional contraction patterns of patients with MVP using CMR feature tracking (FT) strain analysis in comparison to a control group. Methods Of all patients who underwent CMR scans from 2013 to 2022 at our institution, 132 patients with MVP were identified and compared to 50 controls without any cardiac condition. CMR scans were performed on 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and CMR-FT strain analysis was performed on cine images using MEDIS QStrain 4.1. The primary endpoints were regional peak left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain values. Secondary endpoints included LV global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain and right ventricular (RV) free wall longitudinal strain. Differences between groups were assessed using linear regression models, adjusting for age and sex. Results Patients with MVP showed worse regional peak longitudinal strain compared to controls in the basal and part of the medial LV segments, especially in segments S1, S4, S6, S7, and S12. In contrast, the apical segments S13, S14, S15, and S16 showed better strain values. Additionally, LA reservoir strain was reduced in MVP patients. LV GCS, LV GLS, and RV free wall longitudinal strain were similar between both groups. Conclusion While patients with MVP showed preserved LV GCS and GLS compared to controls, LV regional longitudinal strain analysis showed impaired strain in the basal segments and increased strain in the apical segments.

Clinical Research in Cardiology
Max Delbrück Center (DE), United Christian Hospital (CN), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch (DE), Philips (Germany) (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.