Optimization of PET acquisition time for thoracic lesions in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a retrospective analysis

Abstract Objective This study aimed to define the minimum positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition time for chest PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing image quality and lesion detectability comparable to a 20-min reference. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, list-mode data from 101 patients undergoing chest 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/MRI on a 3-T PET/MRI system were reconstructed to simulate 10 acquisition times (0.5–20 min). Two readers assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative parameters, including maximum, mean of the lesion standardized uptake value (L_SUV max , L_SUV mean ), image noise ratio (INR), and lesion-to-background ratio (LBR), were measured. Lesion detectability was defined as the miss rate relative to lesions visible on the 20-min reference acquisition. Results In 101 patients, 283 lesions were identified. Subjective scores increased from a median of 2 (interquartile range 2–2) at 0.5 min to 5 (5–5) at 7 min ( p < 0.001), then plateaued (7–20 min; all p = 1.000). L_SUV max , L_SUV mean , and LBR inversely correlated with scan duration (all p < 0.001). L_SUV mean stabilized at 3 min ( p = 1.000), while L_SUV max /LBR stabilized at 5 min ( p = 1.000). INR required 10 min ( p ≥ 0.054). Lesion miss rates increased time dependently, from 0% at 15 min to 7.77% at 0.5 min. Conclusion A 7-min acquisition time provided subjective quality and detectability comparable to the 20-min protocol, supporting routine use. For quantitative assessments, 3–5 min sufficed, and patients with shorter 18 F-FDG uptake or larger lesions may be adequately assessed with 2 min. Key Points Question What is the minimum PET acquisition time for chest 18F-FDG PET/MRI that maintains image quality and lesion detectability equivalent to a 20‑min reference? Findings A 7‑min PET acquisition matches 20‑min image quality and detectability; quantitative parameters stabilize at 3‑5 min; 2 min suffices for patients with shorter uptake or larger lesions. Relevance statement Reducing PET acquisition time to 7 min enhances patient comfort, reduces motion artifacts, and increases scanner throughput without compromising chest PET/MRI diagnostic performance, thereby improving patient experience and workflow efficiency. Further clinical validation is needed. Keywords Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Magnetic resonance imaging, Patient comfort, Positron emission tomography, Thorax

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology Experimental
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-026-00787-y
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of PET acquisition time for thoracic lesions in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a retrospective analysis

Sui Chen, Long Jiang Zhang, Yue Jiang, Jun Cai et al.
European Radiology Experimental
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Optimization of PET acquisition time for thoracic lesions in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a retrospective analysis

Sui Chen, Long Jiang Zhang, Yue Jiang, Jun Cai, Gang Yang, Song Luo, Haifeng Gu, Jianrui Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to define the minimum positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition time for chest PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing image quality and lesion detectability comparable to a 20-min reference. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, list-mode data from 101 patients undergoing chest 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/MRI on a 3-T PET/MRI system were reconstructed to simulate 10 acquisition times (0.5–20 min). Two readers assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative parameters, including maximum, mean of the lesion standardized uptake value (L_SUV max , L_SUV mean ), image noise ratio (INR), and lesion-to-background ratio (LBR), were measured. Lesion detectability was defined as the miss rate relative to lesions visible on the 20-min reference acquisition. Results In 101 patients, 283 lesions were identified. Subjective scores increased from a median of 2 (interquartile range 2–2) at 0.5 min to 5 (5–5) at 7 min ( p < 0.001), then plateaued (7–20 min; all p = 1.000). L_SUV max , L_SUV mean , and LBR inversely correlated with scan duration (all p < 0.001). L_SUV mean stabilized at 3 min ( p = 1.000), while L_SUV max /LBR stabilized at 5 min ( p = 1.000). INR required 10 min ( p ≥ 0.054). Lesion miss rates increased time dependently, from 0% at 15 min to 7.77% at 0.5 min. Conclusion A 7-min acquisition time provided subjective quality and detectability comparable to the 20-min protocol, supporting routine use. For quantitative assessments, 3–5 min sufficed, and patients with shorter 18 F-FDG uptake or larger lesions may be adequately assessed with 2 min. Key Points Question What is the minimum PET acquisition time for chest 18F-FDG PET/MRI that maintains image quality and lesion detectability equivalent to a 20‑min reference? Findings A 7‑min PET acquisition matches 20‑min image quality and detectability; quantitative parameters stabilize at 3‑5 min; 2 min suffices for patients with shorter uptake or larger lesions. Relevance statement Reducing PET acquisition time to 7 min enhances patient comfort, reduces motion artifacts, and increases scanner throughput without compromising chest PET/MRI diagnostic performance, thereby improving patient experience and workflow efficiency. Further clinical validation is needed. Keywords Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Magnetic resonance imaging, Patient comfort, Positron emission tomography, Thorax

European Radiology ExperimentalVol. 10(1)
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.