Factorial Experiments on Laser Pre‐Treatment of Low‐Carbon Steel Welds Prior to the Application of Organic Coatings

ABSTRACT Effects of weld treatment methods on the performance of organic coatings during accelerated offshore cycle tests were statistically investigated. A full factorial design was applied to low‐carbon steel welds with imperfections and varying preparation methods (blast‐cleaning, mechanical grinding, laser‐based treatments). Laser treatment was evaluated as a supplementary method and as a stand‐alone approach. Surface preparation was the dominant investigated main factor influencing coating damage, with additional significant contributions from weld position, imperfection type, and exposure time. Preparation methods combining laser treatment with mechanical treatment performed equivalent to blast‐cleaning. Purely laser‐based methods, however, resulted in significantly higher damage levels. A key limitation of the 100 W ns‐pulsed laser process was the incomplete removal of silicate welding slag, leading to partial remelting and redeposition of glassy residues within weld grooves. The damage accumulation followed a two‐parameter Weibull model. Laser‐assisted weld preparation had the potential as an alternative to blast‐cleaning, provided that weld geometry is properly conditioned and laser parameters are appropriately scaled.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials and Corrosion
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.70273
Primary Topic
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factorial Experiments on Laser Pre‐Treatment of Low‐Carbon Steel Welds Prior to the Application of Organic Coatings

Thomas Lukasczyk, Veronika Katzy, Sascha Buchbach, Johannes Viertel et al.
Materials and Corrosion
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
article

Factorial Experiments on Laser Pre‐Treatment of Low‐Carbon Steel Welds Prior to the Application of Organic Coatings

Thomas Lukasczyk, Veronika Katzy, Sascha Buchbach, Johannes Viertel, Andreas W. Momber, Jürgen Graßl, Tom Marquardt, Oliver Holger Kranz
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effects of weld treatment methods on the performance of organic coatings during accelerated offshore cycle tests were statistically investigated. A full factorial design was applied to low‐carbon steel welds with imperfections and varying preparation methods (blast‐cleaning, mechanical grinding, laser‐based treatments). Laser treatment was evaluated as a supplementary method and as a stand‐alone approach. Surface preparation was the dominant investigated main factor influencing coating damage, with additional significant contributions from weld position, imperfection type, and exposure time. Preparation methods combining laser treatment with mechanical treatment performed equivalent to blast‐cleaning. Purely laser‐based methods, however, resulted in significantly higher damage levels. A key limitation of the 100 W ns‐pulsed laser process was the incomplete removal of silicate welding slag, leading to partial remelting and redeposition of glassy residues within weld grooves. The damage accumulation followed a two‐parameter Weibull model. Laser‐assisted weld preparation had the potential as an alternative to blast‐cleaning, provided that weld geometry is properly conditioned and laser parameters are appropriately scaled.

Materials and Corrosion
Sherwin Williams (United States) (US), Muehlhan (Germany) (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.