Artificial intelligence knowledge, use, and perceived barriers among health care professionals in rare hematological disease networks

Abstract Background AI techniques are increasingly demonstrating potential in improving patient outcomes, with applications rapidly developing in rare hematological diseases (RHDs), including hemoglobinopathies. To guide AI introduction, it is essential to explore healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) knowledge of basic AI concepts, attitudes, and perspectives toward its integration into hematological clinical research and practice. Methods A cross-sectional survey covering demographics, work environment, AI terminology confidence, research involvement, perceived implementation barriers, concerns, and AI’s impact across care phases was conducted among the European hematology community through the networks European Reference Network-EuroBloodNet and HELIOS initiatives and disseminated through convenience sampling via mailing lists and social media (January 8th–June 1st 2025) on the EU Survey Platform. Answers were analyzed through descriptive and comparative methods. Results 73 HCPs from 25 countries, mostly from southern Europe, answered to the survey, with a low approximate participation of 10%. Most respondents (74%) worked in teaching hospitals; 35.6% in research and 64.4% in clinical practice or both. Physicians constituted 49.3% (69.4% senior); other HCPs, including biologists and nurses, made up 50.7%. 74% correctly identified “Machine Learning,“, while for “Deep Learning” only 57.5% chose correctly, with 37% of confident respondents failing. Although 56.2% felt familiar with “Big-Data,” only 31.5% identified its three core characteristics. Overall, 71.2% used at least one AI tool, and 94.6% believed AI would benefit patients. The most cited barriers were lack of infrastructure, personal liability, AI trustworthiness and patient privacy. Conclusion Despite widespread optimism and AI adoption, significant knowledge gaps persist among RHD professionals, who sometimes overestimate their understanding. These findings will inform the design of targeted, multidisciplinary training tailored to different HCP categories, addressing the identified gaps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04631-9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence knowledge, use, and perceived barriers among health care professionals in rare hematological disease networks

Giulia Reggiani, Maria Paola Boaro, Alessandro Cellini, Sotiroula Chatzimatthaiou et al.
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial intelligence knowledge, use, and perceived barriers among health care professionals in rare hematological disease networks

Giulia Reggiani, Maria Paola Boaro, Alessandro Cellini, Sotiroula Chatzimatthaiou, Elisabetta Mezzalira, Raffaella Colombatti, Alessandro Boaro, Mirco D’Agnolo, María Del Mar Mañú Pereira, Giorgia Ghirardo, Petros Kountouris, Alba Maria Albert Robledo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background AI techniques are increasingly demonstrating potential in improving patient outcomes, with applications rapidly developing in rare hematological diseases (RHDs), including hemoglobinopathies. To guide AI introduction, it is essential to explore healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) knowledge of basic AI concepts, attitudes, and perspectives toward its integration into hematological clinical research and practice. Methods A cross-sectional survey covering demographics, work environment, AI terminology confidence, research involvement, perceived implementation barriers, concerns, and AI’s impact across care phases was conducted among the European hematology community through the networks European Reference Network-EuroBloodNet and HELIOS initiatives and disseminated through convenience sampling via mailing lists and social media (January 8th–June 1st 2025) on the EU Survey Platform. Answers were analyzed through descriptive and comparative methods. Results 73 HCPs from 25 countries, mostly from southern Europe, answered to the survey, with a low approximate participation of 10%. Most respondents (74%) worked in teaching hospitals; 35.6% in research and 64.4% in clinical practice or both. Physicians constituted 49.3% (69.4% senior); other HCPs, including biologists and nurses, made up 50.7%. 74% correctly identified “Machine Learning,“, while for “Deep Learning” only 57.5% chose correctly, with 37% of confident respondents failing. Although 56.2% felt familiar with “Big-Data,” only 31.5% identified its three core characteristics. Overall, 71.2% used at least one AI tool, and 94.6% believed AI would benefit patients. The most cited barriers were lack of infrastructure, personal liability, AI trustworthiness and patient privacy. Conclusion Despite widespread optimism and AI adoption, significant knowledge gaps persist among RHD professionals, who sometimes overestimate their understanding. These findings will inform the design of targeted, multidisciplinary training tailored to different HCP categories, addressing the identified gaps.

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
University of Verona (IT), Hebron University (PS), University of Padua (IT), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.