Bridging Cultural Contexts and Scientific Universality: A Philosophical Materialist Analysis of Pedagogical Tensions in Chemistry Education
Abstract This paper is a critical reflection on the integration of cultural elements in chemistry education, using philosophical materialism (Gustavo Bueno) as the analytical framework. While it acknowledges the value of culturally relevant teaching for fostering inclusive learning environments, the discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining gnoseological and epistemological rigor, as well as the universal principles that define chemistry as a scientific discipline. The paper analyzes the potential risks of overemphasizing cultural and emotional dimensions, as this may inadvertently shift attention away from fundamental chemical concepts and the analytical skills essential for understanding and comprehending scientific knowledge. In addition, this contribution also draws attention to broader systemic factors such as socioeconomic inequalities and disparities in resources that play maybe a more decisive role in educational outcomes but are often overshadowed in debates focused solely on cultural inclusion. The paper advocates for more balanced pedagogical approaches that promote cultural sensitivity without compromising the objective and operational nature of chemistry. Such an approach ensures that educational practices not only respect cultural diversity but also preserve the empirical foundations necessary for meaningful engagement with scientific knowledge. This perspective seeks to contribute to current academic discussions on how to design chemistry education that is both equitable and epistemologically robust.
Authors
- Ricardo Vivas‐Reyes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-1948)
Institutions
- University of Cartagena (CO)
- Universidad San Pablo (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Published
- 2026-10-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6c00369
- Primary Topic
- Chemistry Education and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00