Discrepancies in Extreme Daily and Monthly Precipitation Trends Between Observations and Earth System Models

Abstract While extreme precipitation is expected to intensify globally in a warming climate, changes in extreme precipitation on regional scales remain uncertain. To understand how well Earth system models (ESMs) capture recent changes in regional extreme precipitation, we compare trends in daily and monthly extreme precipitation across multiple observational data sets and three ESM ensembles. Observations and ESMs show similar increases in the percent of land area with positive trends in daily precipitation extremes over time, but ESMs underestimate the magnitude of both positive and negative observed trends in daily extremes. For monthly extremes, ESMs simulate much more widespread increases compared to observations in recent decades. As a result, many recent observed decreasing trends in monthly extreme precipitation fall outside the model distribution. We find similar results when comparing observed trends to those in high‐resolution simulations. These results highlight ongoing challenges in constraining the magnitude of regional extreme precipitation change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl124747
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancies in Extreme Daily and Monthly Precipitation Trends Between Observations and Earth System Models

Frances V. Davenport, Danielle Touma
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
article

Discrepancies in Extreme Daily and Monthly Precipitation Trends Between Observations and Earth System Models

Frances V. Davenport, Danielle Touma
article en

Abstract

Abstract While extreme precipitation is expected to intensify globally in a warming climate, changes in extreme precipitation on regional scales remain uncertain. To understand how well Earth system models (ESMs) capture recent changes in regional extreme precipitation, we compare trends in daily and monthly extreme precipitation across multiple observational data sets and three ESM ensembles. Observations and ESMs show similar increases in the percent of land area with positive trends in daily precipitation extremes over time, but ESMs underestimate the magnitude of both positive and negative observed trends in daily extremes. For monthly extremes, ESMs simulate much more widespread increases compared to observations in recent decades. As a result, many recent observed decreasing trends in monthly extreme precipitation fall outside the model distribution. We find similar results when comparing observed trends to those in high‐resolution simulations. These results highlight ongoing challenges in constraining the magnitude of regional extreme precipitation change.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(19)
The University of Texas at Austin (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discrepancies in Extreme Daily and Monthly Precipitation Trends Between Observations and Earth System Models — Frances V. Davenport, Danielle Touma · Geophysical Research Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS