Ontological frictions in disaster risk assessment: evidence from Yaqui territories, Mexico

Purpose In Indigenous communities where governance integrates land, ancestors and more-than-human beings, standardised risk assessments overlooking relational ontologies may produce incomplete evaluations and inadvertently deepen vulnerabilities. This article analyses ontological frictions in disaster risk assessment (DRA) arising from the encounter between standardised frameworks and Indigenous relational ontologies enacted through governance systems. Design/methodology/approach Six weeks of ethnographic fieldwork in Yaqui communities of Sonora, Mexico, including interviews (n = 35), focus groups (n = 5), participant observation, participatory mapping and archival review. Analysis identified instances where positivist risk categories encountered limits when engaging with Yaqui conceptions of territory, causality and agency. Findings Three ontological frictions emerged: (1) spatial segmentation conflicts with territory as an integral entity structured by lu'uturia yo'owe, a Yaqui cosmogonic governance principle; (2) framing phenomena as climate exposure abstracts political agents into environmental factors, depoliticising territorial conflict and dissolving relational accountability; (3) analytical translation recasts governance-constitutive entities as cultural descriptors, obscuring their organising role and rendering governance invisible to assessment instruments. Practical implications Where relational ordering prevails, the absence of recognisable administrative infrastructure requires consideration of other sources of such infrastructure. Meaningful engagement therefore requires interrogating the ontological assumptions embedded in assessment tools, not just enhancing culturally sensitive consultation. Originality/value This article empirically demonstrates how ontological frictions permeate DRA processes and advances the concept of instrument deficit as an analytical lens for risk governance in Indigenous contexts shaped by climate and territorial pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-02-2026-0081
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ontological frictions in disaster risk assessment: evidence from Yaqui territories, Mexico

Nicholas Q. Emlen, Tim van Zutphen, Cesar Cervantes Benavides, Rónán McDermott et al.
Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Ontological frictions in disaster risk assessment: evidence from Yaqui territories, Mexico

Nicholas Q. Emlen, Tim van Zutphen, Cesar Cervantes Benavides, Rónán McDermott, Caspar van den Berg, Meghan Muldoon
article en

Abstract

Purpose In Indigenous communities where governance integrates land, ancestors and more-than-human beings, standardised risk assessments overlooking relational ontologies may produce incomplete evaluations and inadvertently deepen vulnerabilities. This article analyses ontological frictions in disaster risk assessment (DRA) arising from the encounter between standardised frameworks and Indigenous relational ontologies enacted through governance systems. Design/methodology/approach Six weeks of ethnographic fieldwork in Yaqui communities of Sonora, Mexico, including interviews (n = 35), focus groups (n = 5), participant observation, participatory mapping and archival review. Analysis identified instances where positivist risk categories encountered limits when engaging with Yaqui conceptions of territory, causality and agency. Findings Three ontological frictions emerged: (1) spatial segmentation conflicts with territory as an integral entity structured by lu'uturia yo'owe, a Yaqui cosmogonic governance principle; (2) framing phenomena as climate exposure abstracts political agents into environmental factors, depoliticising territorial conflict and dissolving relational accountability; (3) analytical translation recasts governance-constitutive entities as cultural descriptors, obscuring their organising role and rendering governance invisible to assessment instruments. Practical implications Where relational ordering prevails, the absence of recognisable administrative infrastructure requires consideration of other sources of such infrastructure. Meaningful engagement therefore requires interrogating the ontological assumptions embedded in assessment tools, not just enhancing culturally sensitive consultation. Originality/value This article empirically demonstrates how ontological frictions permeate DRA processes and advances the concept of instrument deficit as an analytical lens for risk governance in Indigenous contexts shaped by climate and territorial pressures.

Disaster Prevention and Management An International JournalVol. 35(6)
University of Groningen (NL), Fryske Akademy (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.