Predicting red breast syndrome after ADM-assisted breast reconstruction: An exploratory scoring model using routine hematologic markers

Background Red breast syndrome (RBS) is a challenging complication of acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction. Its incidence and hematologic predictors in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remain poorly characterized. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 70 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction following NAC (January 2011–May 2025) at a single tertiary institution. Patients were stratified into ADM (n = 47) and Non-ADM (n = 23) groups. Within the ADM group, Firth penalized logistic regression with backward elimination identified preoperative variables independently associated with RBS. Optimal cutoffs were determined by the Youden Index. A composite hematologic scoring model (WBC + PLT + Ki-67 High, cutoff ≥2) was developed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling (2,000 iterations). Results RBS occurred in 31.9% (15/47) of ADM patients versus 0% in Non-ADM patients ( p = 0.001). The final model identified WBC (OR 1.235, 95% CI 1.066–1.502, p = 0.004), PLT (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.001–1.028, p = 0.037), and Ki-67 High (OR 8.975, 95% CI 1.356–155.173, p = 0.020) as independently associated with RBS. Individual biomarkers showed modest discrimination (AUC 0.605–0.641, all p > 0.10), while the composite score achieved AUC = 0.816 ( p < 0.001; sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 71.9%, NPV 92.0%). Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.817 (95% CI 0.636–0.959; optimism=−0.001). No significant temporal trend in RBS incidence was observed (Cochran–Armitage, p = 0.527). Conclusions RBS incidence is substantially elevated in post-NAC ADM patients. This exploratory, single-center study develops a hypothesis-generating combination score for preoperative RBS risk stratification using routine laboratory and pathology assessment. External validation in prospective multi-institutional cohorts is required before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359415
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting red breast syndrome after ADM-assisted breast reconstruction: An exploratory scoring model using routine hematologic markers

Jin Lee, Hee Yeon Kim, Dong Hun Lee, Jiyoung Yun et al.
PLoS ONE
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Predicting red breast syndrome after ADM-assisted breast reconstruction: An exploratory scoring model using routine hematologic markers

Jin Lee, Hee Yeon Kim, Dong Hun Lee, Jiyoung Yun, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyung Do Byun
article en

Abstract

Background Red breast syndrome (RBS) is a challenging complication of acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction. Its incidence and hematologic predictors in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remain poorly characterized. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 70 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction following NAC (January 2011–May 2025) at a single tertiary institution. Patients were stratified into ADM (n = 47) and Non-ADM (n = 23) groups. Within the ADM group, Firth penalized logistic regression with backward elimination identified preoperative variables independently associated with RBS. Optimal cutoffs were determined by the Youden Index. A composite hematologic scoring model (WBC + PLT + Ki-67 High, cutoff ≥2) was developed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling (2,000 iterations). Results RBS occurred in 31.9% (15/47) of ADM patients versus 0% in Non-ADM patients ( p = 0.001). The final model identified WBC (OR 1.235, 95% CI 1.066–1.502, p = 0.004), PLT (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.001–1.028, p = 0.037), and Ki-67 High (OR 8.975, 95% CI 1.356–155.173, p = 0.020) as independently associated with RBS. Individual biomarkers showed modest discrimination (AUC 0.605–0.641, all p > 0.10), while the composite score achieved AUC = 0.816 ( p < 0.001; sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 71.9%, NPV 92.0%). Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.817 (95% CI 0.636–0.959; optimism=−0.001). No significant temporal trend in RBS incidence was observed (Cochran–Armitage, p = 0.527). Conclusions RBS incidence is substantially elevated in post-NAC ADM patients. This exploratory, single-center study develops a hypothesis-generating combination score for preoperative RBS risk stratification using routine laboratory and pathology assessment. External validation in prospective multi-institutional cohorts is required before clinical application.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Inje University (KR), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.