Talking risk, enacting resilience: a case study of risk communication in a climate frontline community

Communities on the frontlines of climate change face disproportionate risks of multiple hazards. Although community resilience depends on effective risk communication, most research focuses on the information that individuals receive from authorities rather than that which they produce or exchange themselves—that is, “community-based risk communication”. In this mixed methods case study, we examined how community-based risk communication about climate change unfolded and informed community resilience over 6 months in San Bruno, California, using monthly surveys and follow-up interviews. Participants described their communication as multidirectional, localized, consistent, and actionable. They also identified five mechanisms by which it informed their community resilience: creating a trusted information infrastructure, building knowledge, cultivating collective efficacy, enabling action, and strengthening social capital. These findings suggest that aligning behind and investing in community-led risk communication offers a promising pathway toward community resilience amidst the multiple, compounding hazards posed by a changing climate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj natural hazards.
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00275-8
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Talking risk, enacting resilience: a case study of risk communication in a climate frontline community

Julie L. Demuth, Violet Saena, Cade Cannedy, Stephanie L. Fischer et al.
npj natural hazards.
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Talking risk, enacting resilience: a case study of risk communication in a climate frontline community

Julie L. Demuth, Violet Saena, Cade Cannedy, Stephanie L. Fischer, Gabrielle Wong‐Parodi, Michelle Ng, Kae Jensen, Nilam Ram, Natalie Herbert
article en

Abstract

Communities on the frontlines of climate change face disproportionate risks of multiple hazards. Although community resilience depends on effective risk communication, most research focuses on the information that individuals receive from authorities rather than that which they produce or exchange themselves—that is, “community-based risk communication”. In this mixed methods case study, we examined how community-based risk communication about climate change unfolded and informed community resilience over 6 months in San Bruno, California, using monthly surveys and follow-up interviews. Participants described their communication as multidirectional, localized, consistent, and actionable. They also identified five mechanisms by which it informed their community resilience: creating a trusted information infrastructure, building knowledge, cultivating collective efficacy, enabling action, and strengthening social capital. These findings suggest that aligning behind and investing in community-led risk communication offers a promising pathway toward community resilience amidst the multiple, compounding hazards posed by a changing climate.

npj natural hazards.
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Talking risk, enacting resilience: a case study of risk communication in a climate frontline community — Julie L. Demuth, Violet Saena, et al. · npj natural hazards. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS