A Fusion Framework Integrating UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR for Enhanced Mining-Induced Surface Subsidence Modeling

To address the differences in spatial resolution, monitoring accuracy, and applicability across different subsidence-gradient conditions between Digital Subsidence Models (DSuMs) derived from UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR, this study proposes a multi-source fusion framework that integrates systematic discrepancy correction, spatial residual modeling, and differentiated fusion for constructing a high-precision surface subsidence model. First, systematic biases between LiDAR-DSuM and InSAR-DSuM are identified through consistency analysis of subsidence differences within their overlapping areas. After systematic error correction, spatial modeling of the residuals is performed using semivariogram analysis and Kriging interpolation. The corrected residual field is then integrated with the original datasets to generate a Fused DSuM (Fusion-DSuM). Finally, the accuracies of LiDAR-DSuM, InSAR-DSuM, and Fusion-DSuM are evaluated using GNSS observations as reference data. Before fusion, LiDAR-DSuM had an Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 143 mm and an Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 181 mm, whereas InSAR-DSuM had an MAE of 45 mm and an RMSE of 57 mm. Fusion-DSuM achieved an MAE of 84 mm and an RMSE of 120 mm, representing reductions of 41.26% and 33.70%, respectively, compared with the original LiDAR-DSuM. Although its accuracy was slightly lower than that of SBAS-InSAR, Fusion-DSuM complemented the limitations of SBAS-InSAR in monitoring large-gradient subsidence by incorporating high-resolution LiDAR observations. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework, which integrates systematic discrepancy correction, spatial residual modeling, and differentiated fusion of UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR observations, substantially improves the accuracy of LiDAR-DSuM while providing more complete spatial characterization of surface subsidence. The proposed method supports surface crack identification, rock-mass movement inversion, and geological hazard monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18193424
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Fusion Framework Integrating UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR for Enhanced Mining-Induced Surface Subsidence Modeling

Xiongwei Ma, 姚顽强, Xiaohu Lin, Penghui Liu et al.
Remote Sensing
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
article

A Fusion Framework Integrating UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR for Enhanced Mining-Induced Surface Subsidence Modeling

Xiongwei Ma, 姚顽强, Xiaohu Lin, Penghui Liu, Fuquan Tang, Xuefen Zhang, Junliang Zheng
article en

Abstract

To address the differences in spatial resolution, monitoring accuracy, and applicability across different subsidence-gradient conditions between Digital Subsidence Models (DSuMs) derived from UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR, this study proposes a multi-source fusion framework that integrates systematic discrepancy correction, spatial residual modeling, and differentiated fusion for constructing a high-precision surface subsidence model. First, systematic biases between LiDAR-DSuM and InSAR-DSuM are identified through consistency analysis of subsidence differences within their overlapping areas. After systematic error correction, spatial modeling of the residuals is performed using semivariogram analysis and Kriging interpolation. The corrected residual field is then integrated with the original datasets to generate a Fused DSuM (Fusion-DSuM). Finally, the accuracies of LiDAR-DSuM, InSAR-DSuM, and Fusion-DSuM are evaluated using GNSS observations as reference data. Before fusion, LiDAR-DSuM had an Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 143 mm and an Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 181 mm, whereas InSAR-DSuM had an MAE of 45 mm and an RMSE of 57 mm. Fusion-DSuM achieved an MAE of 84 mm and an RMSE of 120 mm, representing reductions of 41.26% and 33.70%, respectively, compared with the original LiDAR-DSuM. Although its accuracy was slightly lower than that of SBAS-InSAR, Fusion-DSuM complemented the limitations of SBAS-InSAR in monitoring large-gradient subsidence by incorporating high-resolution LiDAR observations. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework, which integrates systematic discrepancy correction, spatial residual modeling, and differentiated fusion of UAV LiDAR and SBAS-InSAR observations, substantially improves the accuracy of LiDAR-DSuM while providing more complete spatial characterization of surface subsidence. The proposed method supports surface crack identification, rock-mass movement inversion, and geological hazard monitoring.

Remote SensingVol. 18(19)
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.