Site Versus Core Lab-Adjudicated First- and Final-Pass eTICI Scores Compared During Off and Normal Hours: Insights From the ASSIST Registry

BACKGROUND: Data from the ASSIST registry were analyzed to assess whether site-reported expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) scores differ from those reported by the core lab during off hours compared with normal hours. We also assessed whether outcomes are worse in procedures performed during off hours. METHODS: Details from the registry have been previously published. Regression models were performed for first-pass treatment of target occlusion resulting in ≥2c by the core lab, agreement for final pass ≥2c, modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at 90 days, and whether first-pass eTICI ≥2c agreed between the core lab and site-reported assessments. RESULTS: A total of 1318 patients were included. Overall, agreement between core-lab and site-reported eTICI for first-pass eTICI ≥2c occurred in 86.7% and 78.5% for final eTICI ≥2c. Agreement for first-pass and final-pass eTICI ≥2c occurred in 87.2% and 77.7% during normal hours and 86.1% and 79.3% during off hours. Good functional outcomes occurred in 55.5% of patients presenting during normal hours and 53.8% of patients presenting during off hours. Off-hour versus normal-hour procedures were not significantly associated with first-pass efficacy, modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at 90 days, or whether first-pass eTICI agreed between the core lab and site-reported assessments in adjusted regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher level of agreement between core-lab and site-reported first-pass eTICI scores during all hours, while agreement occurred less often for final reperfusion. These results suggest a high level of correlation regardless of the time of the procedure between site-adjudicated and core-lab-adjudicated successful reperfusion grading. There were no significant differences in outcomes irrespective of the timing of thrombectomy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03845491.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.126.002502
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Site Versus Core Lab-Adjudicated First- and Final-Pass eTICI Scores Compared During Off and Normal Hours: Insights From the ASSIST Registry

Osama O. Zaidat, Markus Alfred Möhlenbruch, David S. Liebeskind, Lori Lyn Price et al.
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Site Versus Core Lab-Adjudicated First- and Final-Pass eTICI Scores Compared During Off and Normal Hours: Insights From the ASSIST Registry

Osama O. Zaidat, Markus Alfred Möhlenbruch, David S. Liebeskind, Lori Lyn Price, Pedro Vega, Bharath Naravetla, Ryan McTaggart, Luc Defreyne, Mario Martínez‐Galdámez, Sudeepta Dandapat, Salvador Miralbés, Rishi G. Gupta, Christian Loehr, for the ASSIST Investigators, Alejandro Spiotta
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data from the ASSIST registry were analyzed to assess whether site-reported expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) scores differ from those reported by the core lab during off hours compared with normal hours. We also assessed whether outcomes are worse in procedures performed during off hours. METHODS: Details from the registry have been previously published. Regression models were performed for first-pass treatment of target occlusion resulting in ≥2c by the core lab, agreement for final pass ≥2c, modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at 90 days, and whether first-pass eTICI ≥2c agreed between the core lab and site-reported assessments. RESULTS: A total of 1318 patients were included. Overall, agreement between core-lab and site-reported eTICI for first-pass eTICI ≥2c occurred in 86.7% and 78.5% for final eTICI ≥2c. Agreement for first-pass and final-pass eTICI ≥2c occurred in 87.2% and 77.7% during normal hours and 86.1% and 79.3% during off hours. Good functional outcomes occurred in 55.5% of patients presenting during normal hours and 53.8% of patients presenting during off hours. Off-hour versus normal-hour procedures were not significantly associated with first-pass efficacy, modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at 90 days, or whether first-pass eTICI agreed between the core lab and site-reported assessments in adjusted regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher level of agreement between core-lab and site-reported first-pass eTICI scores during all hours, while agreement occurred less often for final reperfusion. These results suggest a high level of correlation regardless of the time of the procedure between site-adjudicated and core-lab-adjudicated successful reperfusion grading. There were no significant differences in outcomes irrespective of the timing of thrombectomy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03845491.

Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Aurora Health Care (US), WellStar Health System (US), Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Rhode Island Hospital (US), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Klinikum Vest (DE), McLaren Macomb (US), Bon Secours Mercy Health (US), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), Hospital Universitario Son Espases (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.