Healthcare students’ perspectives on practicing in a state with restrictive healthcare laws: A cross-sectional survey

Objectives: Reports of healthcare provider departures and rural hospital service closures in Idaho, United States have raised concerns about the state’s ability to attract and retain future healthcare professionals. Recent legislation, including restrictions on abortion (Idaho Panel Code Section 18-622), parental consent requirements for minors (SB 1329), and limitations on gender-affirming care (HB0071, H0668), may affect healthcare practice and access to comprehensive patient care. Present study primarily examined whether these laws influence healthcare students’ confidence in providing comprehensive care and their intentions to remain and practice in Idaho after graduation. Material and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in Idaho, United States. Healthcare students enrolled at Idaho State University (ISU) and the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM) were invited to participate if they were currently enrolled in a healthcare-related professional program. The 12-item survey included three sections covering participant demographics, perceived knowledge of four recent healthcare laws and their impact on education, and the perceived influence of these laws on future clinical practice. Results: A total of 118 students representing 13 healthcare disciplines participated in the study. Nearly one-third (30.5%, n = 36) reported lacking confidence in their ability to provide comprehensive care in Idaho, while over one-third (36.4%, n = 43) indicated they were less likely to remain and practice in the state under the current legislative environment. A strong and statistically significant association was observed between students’ confidence in providing comprehensive care and their intention to continue practicing in Idaho (χ 2 (9) = 89.4, p < 0.001; Cramér’s V = 0.503). Conclusion: These findings suggest that Idaho’s current legislative environment may influence healthcare students’ intentions to practice in the state after graduation, potentially affecting future healthcare workforce retention and contributing to existing provider shortages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Healthcare Research and Education
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jhre_14_2026
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare students’ perspectives on practicing in a state with restrictive healthcare laws: A cross-sectional survey

Glenda Carr, Mya McArthur
Journal of Healthcare Research and Education
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Healthcare students’ perspectives on practicing in a state with restrictive healthcare laws: A cross-sectional survey

Glenda Carr, Mya McArthur
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Reports of healthcare provider departures and rural hospital service closures in Idaho, United States have raised concerns about the state’s ability to attract and retain future healthcare professionals. Recent legislation, including restrictions on abortion (Idaho Panel Code Section 18-622), parental consent requirements for minors (SB 1329), and limitations on gender-affirming care (HB0071, H0668), may affect healthcare practice and access to comprehensive patient care. Present study primarily examined whether these laws influence healthcare students’ confidence in providing comprehensive care and their intentions to remain and practice in Idaho after graduation. Material and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in Idaho, United States. Healthcare students enrolled at Idaho State University (ISU) and the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM) were invited to participate if they were currently enrolled in a healthcare-related professional program. The 12-item survey included three sections covering participant demographics, perceived knowledge of four recent healthcare laws and their impact on education, and the perceived influence of these laws on future clinical practice. Results: A total of 118 students representing 13 healthcare disciplines participated in the study. Nearly one-third (30.5%, n = 36) reported lacking confidence in their ability to provide comprehensive care in Idaho, while over one-third (36.4%, n = 43) indicated they were less likely to remain and practice in the state under the current legislative environment. A strong and statistically significant association was observed between students’ confidence in providing comprehensive care and their intention to continue practicing in Idaho (χ 2 (9) = 89.4, p < 0.001; Cramér’s V = 0.503). Conclusion: These findings suggest that Idaho’s current legislative environment may influence healthcare students’ intentions to practice in the state after graduation, potentially affecting future healthcare workforce retention and contributing to existing provider shortages.

Journal of Healthcare Research and EducationVol. 2
Idaho State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare students’ perspectives on practicing in a state with restrictive healthcare laws: A cross-sectional survey — Glenda Carr, Mya McArthur · Journal of Healthcare Research and Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS