Evaluation of a co-produced rights and relationships program: pilot with high school students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students

Objectives High-school students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students frequently receive limited education about rights, relationships, and consent, increasing their vulnerability to abuse and exploitation. There is a need for accessible, evidence-based, and co-produced programs that address these gaps. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and social validity of the co-produced Rights and Relationships (R + R) program delivered in high schools in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.Methods A mixed-methods design was employed across eight NSW high schools. The total sample comprised 70 participants: 56 secondary students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students, 11 teachers, and three co-educators, one of whom has intellectual disability. Quantitative data were collected using pre- and post-module quizzes to assess knowledge acquisition across program modules. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with students, teachers, and co-educators to explore perceptions of accessibility, relevance, and impact. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired t-tests to determine significant knowledge gains, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically to examine social validity and participant experience.Results Students demonstrated increased knowledge across all program content areas following participation. Statistically significant improvements were identified in the Relationships and the Law module, particularly in understanding consent. Qualitative findings indicated high social validity. Participants described the program as accessible, engaging, and relevant to students’ lived experiences. Teachers reported increased student confidence in discussing relationships and rights, and co-educators highlighted the importance of lived experience in fostering authenticity, trust, and engagement.Conclusions The R + R program was found to increase students’ short-term knowledge of rights and relationships, and was rated as socially valid within NSW high school contexts. This study also demonstrates that co-production, including involvement of a researcher and co-educator with intellectual disability, strengthens both program delivery and evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sexual Health
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2026.2735849
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a co-produced rights and relationships program: pilot with high school students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students

Iva Strnadová, Jana Bernoldová, Joanne Danker, Sierra Angelina Willow et al.
International Journal of Sexual Health
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Evaluation of a co-produced rights and relationships program: pilot with high school students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students

Iva Strnadová, Jana Bernoldová, Joanne Danker, Sierra Angelina Willow, Michelle Tso, Julie Loblinzk, Caroline Basckin, Hee Min Lee, Karen Watson
article en

Abstract

Objectives High-school students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students frequently receive limited education about rights, relationships, and consent, increasing their vulnerability to abuse and exploitation. There is a need for accessible, evidence-based, and co-produced programs that address these gaps. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and social validity of the co-produced Rights and Relationships (R + R) program delivered in high schools in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.Methods A mixed-methods design was employed across eight NSW high schools. The total sample comprised 70 participants: 56 secondary students with intellectual disability and/or autistic students, 11 teachers, and three co-educators, one of whom has intellectual disability. Quantitative data were collected using pre- and post-module quizzes to assess knowledge acquisition across program modules. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with students, teachers, and co-educators to explore perceptions of accessibility, relevance, and impact. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired t-tests to determine significant knowledge gains, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically to examine social validity and participant experience.Results Students demonstrated increased knowledge across all program content areas following participation. Statistically significant improvements were identified in the Relationships and the Law module, particularly in understanding consent. Qualitative findings indicated high social validity. Participants described the program as accessible, engaging, and relevant to students’ lived experiences. Teachers reported increased student confidence in discussing relationships and rights, and co-educators highlighted the importance of lived experience in fostering authenticity, trust, and engagement.Conclusions The R + R program was found to increase students’ short-term knowledge of rights and relationships, and was rated as socially valid within NSW high school contexts. This study also demonstrates that co-production, including involvement of a researcher and co-educator with intellectual disability, strengthens both program delivery and evaluation.

International Journal of Sexual Health
Charles University (CZ), UNSW Sydney (AU), Faculty of Design (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.