Adjuvant radiotherapy in FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer: evidence and perspectives in the molecular era

Current guidelines incorporate chemo-immunotherapy for stage III–IV mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, but the evidence supporting omission of adjuvant radiotherapy remains insufficient. Given the pivotal role of pelvic radiotherapy in achieving durable locoregional control in high-risk endometrial cancer, and the lack of robust randomized evidence demonstrating equivalence of systemic therapy alone, the suggestion that EBRT may be safely omitted in the adjuvant treatment of dMMR high-risk disease warrants careful consideration. Importantly, PORTEC-3 (NCT00411138) included radiotherapy in both treatment groups and no immunotherapy, whereas in KEYNOTE-B21 (ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053, NCT04634877) radiotherapy was not randomized; neither trial therefore directly tested the safety of radiotherapy omission. In this Viewpoint, we review current evidence and unresolved questions in the adjuvant management of FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer, with particular attention to the role of radiotherapy in the evolving chemo-immunotherapy era. While our discussion is intentionally focused on dMMR disease, many of the broader considerations regarding the interpretation of emerging evidence and the preservation of effective locoregional treatment are not exclusive to this molecular subgroup. Ongoing trials, including NRG-GY020 (NCT04214067) and the RAINBO MMRd-GREEN trial (ENGOT-en14/GREEN, NCT05255653), are expected to define the optimal integration of immunotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy in molecularly stratified populations. Beyond survival, locoregional control, recurrence burden, and quality of life remain clinically meaningful endpoints. Future randomized trials should evaluate radiotherapy as an independent treatment variable within molecularly stratified populations, incorporating not only survival but also patterns of failure and patient-reported outcomes. Until such data become available, treatment de-escalation strategies should be adopted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EClinicalMedicine
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104257
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjuvant radiotherapy in FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer: evidence and perspectives in the molecular era

Donatella Russo, Francesca De Felice, Domenica Lorusso, Gabriella Macchia et al.
EClinicalMedicine
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Adjuvant radiotherapy in FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer: evidence and perspectives in the molecular era

Donatella Russo, Francesca De Felice, Domenica Lorusso, Gabriella Macchia, Cláudia Marchetti, Anna Maria Merlotti
article en

Abstract

Current guidelines incorporate chemo-immunotherapy for stage III–IV mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, but the evidence supporting omission of adjuvant radiotherapy remains insufficient. Given the pivotal role of pelvic radiotherapy in achieving durable locoregional control in high-risk endometrial cancer, and the lack of robust randomized evidence demonstrating equivalence of systemic therapy alone, the suggestion that EBRT may be safely omitted in the adjuvant treatment of dMMR high-risk disease warrants careful consideration. Importantly, PORTEC-3 (NCT00411138) included radiotherapy in both treatment groups and no immunotherapy, whereas in KEYNOTE-B21 (ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053, NCT04634877) radiotherapy was not randomized; neither trial therefore directly tested the safety of radiotherapy omission. In this Viewpoint, we review current evidence and unresolved questions in the adjuvant management of FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer, with particular attention to the role of radiotherapy in the evolving chemo-immunotherapy era. While our discussion is intentionally focused on dMMR disease, many of the broader considerations regarding the interpretation of emerging evidence and the preservation of effective locoregional treatment are not exclusive to this molecular subgroup. Ongoing trials, including NRG-GY020 (NCT04214067) and the RAINBO MMRd-GREEN trial (ENGOT-en14/GREEN, NCT05255653), are expected to define the optimal integration of immunotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy in molecularly stratified populations. Beyond survival, locoregional control, recurrence burden, and quality of life remain clinically meaningful endpoints. Future randomized trials should evaluate radiotherapy as an independent treatment variable within molecularly stratified populations, incorporating not only survival but also patterns of failure and patient-reported outcomes. Until such data become available, treatment de-escalation strategies should be adopted with caution.

EClinicalMedicineVol. 101
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Humanitas University (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo (IT), Ospedale Vito Fazzi (IT), Regione Molise (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.