Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus by birth order: A descriptive study across lifetime reproductive history

Abstract Introduction Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus are known to be strongly related, and underlying maternal cardiometabolic dysfunction has been proposed as a mechanism for both complications. A comparison of the trends by birth order for the two complications may reveal insights into their shared or different causes. Material and Methods We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2020 with an aim to compare risk by birth order for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Visualizations of cross‐sectional risks by birth order are stratified by mother's age, calendar year, and mother's body mass index. Results The risk of gestational diabetes mellitus appeared to increase by birth order, while hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were most common in first birth. GDM was more common in one‐child mothers than mothers with 2 to 4 lifetime births (OR 1.96, 95%CI 1.83, 2.10). For hypertensive disorders, we observed above 50 per 1000 births in first birth, but below 50 per 1000 births for later births, regardless of covariates. We no longer observed this trend by birth order for gestational diabetes (with risk around 60 per 1000 births for 40 year old mothers at any parity, for instance). Higher risk of diabetes in subsequent pregnancies reflects the older age of mothers. Mothers' body mass index is a known risk factor for both complications. Conclusions The increase in gestational diabetes mellitus by birth order closely reflects trends in other chronological variables like year and age. One explanation for the distinctive rise in gestational diabetes prevalence in later births is secular trends, while secular trends do not fully explain trends by birth order for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Different relationships to birth order and secular trends indicate different contributing mechanisms besides maternal cardiometabolic dysfunction in these two complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70366
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus by birth order: A descriptive study across lifetime reproductive history

Aditi Singh, Liv Grimstvedt Kvalvik, Sage Wyatt, Linn Marie Sørbye et al.
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus by birth order: A descriptive study across lifetime reproductive history

Aditi Singh, Liv Grimstvedt Kvalvik, Sage Wyatt, Linn Marie Sørbye, Rolv Skjærven
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus are known to be strongly related, and underlying maternal cardiometabolic dysfunction has been proposed as a mechanism for both complications. A comparison of the trends by birth order for the two complications may reveal insights into their shared or different causes. Material and Methods We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2020 with an aim to compare risk by birth order for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Visualizations of cross‐sectional risks by birth order are stratified by mother's age, calendar year, and mother's body mass index. Results The risk of gestational diabetes mellitus appeared to increase by birth order, while hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were most common in first birth. GDM was more common in one‐child mothers than mothers with 2 to 4 lifetime births (OR 1.96, 95%CI 1.83, 2.10). For hypertensive disorders, we observed above 50 per 1000 births in first birth, but below 50 per 1000 births for later births, regardless of covariates. We no longer observed this trend by birth order for gestational diabetes (with risk around 60 per 1000 births for 40 year old mothers at any parity, for instance). Higher risk of diabetes in subsequent pregnancies reflects the older age of mothers. Mothers' body mass index is a known risk factor for both complications. Conclusions The increase in gestational diabetes mellitus by birth order closely reflects trends in other chronological variables like year and age. One explanation for the distinctive rise in gestational diabetes prevalence in later births is secular trends, while secular trends do not fully explain trends by birth order for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Different relationships to birth order and secular trends indicate different contributing mechanisms besides maternal cardiometabolic dysfunction in these two complications.

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.