Design, implementation, and validation of a low-cost wired MEMS inertial motion capture system

Purpose High-precision motion capture systems can cost more than $10,000, while affordable inertial alternatives are wireless-only, keep raw sensor data locked away and offer no scope for tuning the fusion algorithm. The purpose of this study is to design, build and validate an affordable, wired system that gives researchers unrestricted access to raw IMU data for custom sensor fusion. Design/methodology/approach A 12-node capture suit was built around MEMS inertial measurement units linked through a deterministic RS-485 wired network, with a central controller streaming raw accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer data at 100 Hz. Orientation was computed using a quaternion extended Kalman filter tuned transparently via Allan-variance characterization. Accuracy was assessed at 60 Hz against a Vicon T40S optical reference using a servo-driven turntable, and through walking and squatting trials with five participants, evaluated via RMSE, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Findings Against the Vicon T40S, the system produced RMSE values of 1.8° for pitch and 2.1° for roll, with strong linear correlation (Pearson r above 0.99) and clinically acceptable Bland–Altman limits. Yaw accuracy was weaker, at 6.2–7.1° RMSE, a direct trade-off from omitting adaptive magnetic rejection to preserve real-time stability. Hardware costs fell by 38–43% and installed cost by 53–58% relative to the Vicon T40S. Originality/value Most affordable inertial motion capture systems are wireless and release only preprocessed pose data through closed pipelines. This system instead combines a deterministic wired multi-node network, a fully transparent and adjustable Kalman filter and rigorous validation against an optical gold standard, at an installed cost under $5,000.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensor Review
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sr-06-2026-0605
Primary Topic
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design, implementation, and validation of a low-cost wired MEMS inertial motion capture system

Sanjay W. Rukhande, Sangram Redkar, Xunguang Li, Dhananjay Panchagade
Sensor Review
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
article

Design, implementation, and validation of a low-cost wired MEMS inertial motion capture system

Sanjay W. Rukhande, Sangram Redkar, Xunguang Li, Dhananjay Panchagade
article en

Abstract

Purpose High-precision motion capture systems can cost more than $10,000, while affordable inertial alternatives are wireless-only, keep raw sensor data locked away and offer no scope for tuning the fusion algorithm. The purpose of this study is to design, build and validate an affordable, wired system that gives researchers unrestricted access to raw IMU data for custom sensor fusion. Design/methodology/approach A 12-node capture suit was built around MEMS inertial measurement units linked through a deterministic RS-485 wired network, with a central controller streaming raw accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer data at 100 Hz. Orientation was computed using a quaternion extended Kalman filter tuned transparently via Allan-variance characterization. Accuracy was assessed at 60 Hz against a Vicon T40S optical reference using a servo-driven turntable, and through walking and squatting trials with five participants, evaluated via RMSE, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Findings Against the Vicon T40S, the system produced RMSE values of 1.8° for pitch and 2.1° for roll, with strong linear correlation (Pearson r above 0.99) and clinically acceptable Bland–Altman limits. Yaw accuracy was weaker, at 6.2–7.1° RMSE, a direct trade-off from omitting adaptive magnetic rejection to preserve real-time stability. Hardware costs fell by 38–43% and installed cost by 53–58% relative to the Vicon T40S. Originality/value Most affordable inertial motion capture systems are wireless and release only preprocessed pose data through closed pipelines. This system instead combines a deterministic wired multi-node network, a fully transparent and adjustable Kalman filter and rigorous validation against an optical gold standard, at an installed cost under $5,000.

Sensor Review
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Design, implementation, and validation of a low-cost wired MEMS inertial motion capture system — Sanjay W. Rukhande, Sangram Redkar, et al. · Sensor Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS