Assessing the Effectiveness of Farmer to Farmer Extension (F2Fe) in Adamawa State, Nigeria

In Adamawa State, slow pace of agricultural development has been viewed as a system problem and F2Fe method seems to have a potential to reverse the trend. The focus of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of farmer to farmer extension. Specifically, respondent’s perception of effectiveness and factors influencing F2Fe in the study area were examined. Structured questionnaire were used to collect data from 354 respondents using multistage random sampling technique from three (3) LGAs purposively selected. Analytical tools used were descriptive statistics while inferential statistics used was the multiple regression analysis. The result revealed that the overall effectiveness score of the group was (X ) 1.9 indicating that F2Fe was effective on the average based on the pre-determined a piriori mean range of 1.0 – 1.4 low effective, 1.5 – 2.4 moderately effective, 2.5 and above highly effective. The result further identified factors influencing F2Fe in the study area based on the regression outcome, R2 value was found to be 65.5%, adjusted R2 value is 64.6%, F-value was 72.46 and was significant at 5% level of significance, the estimated parameter age was negative (coefficient of -0.54629 and significant a 5% level of probability (T = - 1.88) Farm size was negative and significant at 5% level (coefficient of -0.59311 and T = 2.23**). The educational level, extension contact and membership of farmers’ association were all positively significant at 5% level of probability (coefficient of 2.00203, 0.69652, 1.09152 and T = 7.93**, 3.90**, 5.05** respectively. Farming experience was negatively significant at 5% level (coefficient of -1.013241 and T = -3.30**). The study thus concludes that F2Fe is effective and that farmers in the study area prefer the F2Fe method due to its attributes of transferring agricultural technologies at a faster, easier and more effective way. Based on these findings, the study recommends that government should adopt the use of F2Fe method to complement public extension service in order to reduce the ratio of extension agent to farmer for efficient extension service delivery. Furthermore, extension service providers should collaborate with lead farmers and other stakeholders in a public-private partnership (PPP) to disseminate innovative technologies to farmers via the F2Fe platform.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ADSU Global Journal of Geography and Environmental Sciences
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64290/gjges.v6i2.53
Primary Topic
Agricultural Development and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Effectiveness of Farmer to Farmer Extension (F2Fe) in Adamawa State, Nigeria

A. N. Thliza, G. Yohanna, A.J. Madugu, A. Kayam
ADSU Global Journal of Geography and Environmental Sciences
Agricultural Development and Management
article

Assessing the Effectiveness of Farmer to Farmer Extension (F2Fe) in Adamawa State, Nigeria

A. N. Thliza, G. Yohanna, A.J. Madugu, A. Kayam
article en

Abstract

In Adamawa State, slow pace of agricultural development has been viewed as a system problem and F2Fe method seems to have a potential to reverse the trend. The focus of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of farmer to farmer extension. Specifically, respondent’s perception of effectiveness and factors influencing F2Fe in the study area were examined. Structured questionnaire were used to collect data from 354 respondents using multistage random sampling technique from three (3) LGAs purposively selected. Analytical tools used were descriptive statistics while inferential statistics used was the multiple regression analysis. The result revealed that the overall effectiveness score of the group was (X ) 1.9 indicating that F2Fe was effective on the average based on the pre-determined a piriori mean range of 1.0 – 1.4 low effective, 1.5 – 2.4 moderately effective, 2.5 and above highly effective. The result further identified factors influencing F2Fe in the study area based on the regression outcome, R2 value was found to be 65.5%, adjusted R2 value is 64.6%, F-value was 72.46 and was significant at 5% level of significance, the estimated parameter age was negative (coefficient of -0.54629 and significant a 5% level of probability (T = - 1.88) Farm size was negative and significant at 5% level (coefficient of -0.59311 and T = 2.23**). The educational level, extension contact and membership of farmers’ association were all positively significant at 5% level of probability (coefficient of 2.00203, 0.69652, 1.09152 and T = 7.93**, 3.90**, 5.05** respectively. Farming experience was negatively significant at 5% level (coefficient of -1.013241 and T = -3.30**). The study thus concludes that F2Fe is effective and that farmers in the study area prefer the F2Fe method due to its attributes of transferring agricultural technologies at a faster, easier and more effective way. Based on these findings, the study recommends that government should adopt the use of F2Fe method to complement public extension service in order to reduce the ratio of extension agent to farmer for efficient extension service delivery. Furthermore, extension service providers should collaborate with lead farmers and other stakeholders in a public-private partnership (PPP) to disseminate innovative technologies to farmers via the F2Fe platform.

ADSU Global Journal of Geography and Environmental Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agricultural Development and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.