AI recommendation agent autonomy and tourists’ adoption intention: the boundary role of occupational type

Purpose Drawing on compensatory control theory, this study aims to examine how AI recommendation agent type (autonomous AI vs. collaborative AI) influences tourists’ adoption intention. It further investigates the moderating role of tourists’ occupational type and the mediating role of perceived control. Design/methodology/approach Three scenario-based experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 tested the general effect of AI recommendation agent type on adoption intention. Experiment 2 examined the moderating role of occupational type (manual labor vs. mental labor) and the mediating role of perceived control in the relationship between AI recommendation agent type and adoption intention. Experiment 3 manipulated participants’ temporary control state, namely, control deprivation versus control affirmation, to provide causal evidence for the proposed control-based mechanism. Findings When tourists’ occupational type was not differentiated, tourists were generally more willing to adopt recommendations from autonomous AI than from collaborative AI. Occupational type significantly moderated this relationship. Manual laborers were more willing to adopt recommendations from collaborative AI, whereas mental laborers were more willing to adopt recommendations from autonomous AI. Perceived control in the AI recommendation interaction mediated the interaction effect of AI recommendation agent type and occupational type on adoption intention. Experiment 3 further showed that the temporary control state changed individuals’ preferences for autonomous versus collaborative AI. Originality/value This study extends tourism AI adoption research by shifting attention from AI-generated content and tourists’ general perceptions of AI technologies to the autonomy of AI recommendation agents. It also enriches compensatory control theory by applying it to AI-enabled tourism recommendation contexts and distinguishing different sources of perceived control provided by autonomous and collaborative AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-02-2026-0221
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI recommendation agent autonomy and tourists’ adoption intention: the boundary role of occupational type

Yuchen Wang, Qiang Wang, Yueli Tang, Andrew Z. A. Jin et al.
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
AI in Service Interactions
article

AI recommendation agent autonomy and tourists’ adoption intention: the boundary role of occupational type

Yuchen Wang, Qiang Wang, Yueli Tang, Andrew Z. A. Jin, Guohao Pan
article en

Abstract

Purpose Drawing on compensatory control theory, this study aims to examine how AI recommendation agent type (autonomous AI vs. collaborative AI) influences tourists’ adoption intention. It further investigates the moderating role of tourists’ occupational type and the mediating role of perceived control. Design/methodology/approach Three scenario-based experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 tested the general effect of AI recommendation agent type on adoption intention. Experiment 2 examined the moderating role of occupational type (manual labor vs. mental labor) and the mediating role of perceived control in the relationship between AI recommendation agent type and adoption intention. Experiment 3 manipulated participants’ temporary control state, namely, control deprivation versus control affirmation, to provide causal evidence for the proposed control-based mechanism. Findings When tourists’ occupational type was not differentiated, tourists were generally more willing to adopt recommendations from autonomous AI than from collaborative AI. Occupational type significantly moderated this relationship. Manual laborers were more willing to adopt recommendations from collaborative AI, whereas mental laborers were more willing to adopt recommendations from autonomous AI. Perceived control in the AI recommendation interaction mediated the interaction effect of AI recommendation agent type and occupational type on adoption intention. Experiment 3 further showed that the temporary control state changed individuals’ preferences for autonomous versus collaborative AI. Originality/value This study extends tourism AI adoption research by shifting attention from AI-generated content and tourists’ general perceptions of AI technologies to the autonomy of AI recommendation agents. It also enriches compensatory control theory by applying it to AI-enabled tourism recommendation contexts and distinguishing different sources of perceived control provided by autonomous and collaborative AI.

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
Hainan University (CN), City University of Macau (MO), Guangdong Ocean University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.