People’s populism? Institutionalization and organization as the blind spots of contemporary left populism

This article seeks to explain the failure of the left populist wave of the 2010s. Against prevailing explanations that emphasize contingency, historical context or leadership decisions, we argue that the failure of left populism stems, among other things, from the shortcomings of post-Marxism. More specifically, post-Marxism seeks to replace the material forms of organization – central to the Marxist tradition – with symbolic representation, thereby conceiving the ‘people’ as a discursive construct rather than as a politically organized force. This, in turn, leads to the neglect of material organization through the party form. We develop this argument through an analysis of both post-Marxism as articulated by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, and the trajectories of Syriza and Podemos parties. We conclude that the future of left populism depends not merely on its ability to name the people – but on its capacity to organize them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Ideologies
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2026.2744287
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

People’s populism? Institutionalization and organization as the blind spots of contemporary left populism

Yair Goldshmidt, Doron Navot
Journal of Political Ideologies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

People’s populism? Institutionalization and organization as the blind spots of contemporary left populism

Yair Goldshmidt, Doron Navot
article en

Abstract

This article seeks to explain the failure of the left populist wave of the 2010s. Against prevailing explanations that emphasize contingency, historical context or leadership decisions, we argue that the failure of left populism stems, among other things, from the shortcomings of post-Marxism. More specifically, post-Marxism seeks to replace the material forms of organization – central to the Marxist tradition – with symbolic representation, thereby conceiving the ‘people’ as a discursive construct rather than as a politically organized force. This, in turn, leads to the neglect of material organization through the party form. We develop this argument through an analysis of both post-Marxism as articulated by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, and the trajectories of Syriza and Podemos parties. We conclude that the future of left populism depends not merely on its ability to name the people – but on its capacity to organize them.

Journal of Political Ideologies
University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.