High Satisfaction, Modest Differences: A Comparative Cohort Study of Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background/Objectives: Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (raTHA) improves the accuracy and reproducibility of acetabular component positioning compared with conventional THA (cTHA), but whether this translates into superior patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction remains debated. Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was performed, including all patients who underwent primary raTHA with the Mako system at our institution (September 2024–May 2025) and an equal-sized control group recruited consecutively from an alphabetically ordered list of 172 eligible cTHAs, starting from a randomly selected letter (August 2022–January 2025), with a minimum follow-up of one year. Treatment allocation was determined by insurance coverage. The postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was the primary outcome; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were secondary outcomes, and an overall satisfaction rating and willingness to undergo the surgery again were also recorded. Results: Ninety-three raTHA and 93 cTHA patients were analyzed. Follow-up was longer in the cTHA group (35.6 vs. 15.5 months; p < 0.001). Postoperative WOMAC (10.5 vs. 14.4; mean difference −3.8 points, 95% CI −7.4 to −0.2) and mHHS (86.9 vs. 84.7; mean difference 2.2 points, 95% CI −0.9 to 5.4) differed in rank-based comparisons, favoring raTHA (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.020 and p = 0.030, respectively). Point estimates were below the selected clinical-relevance thresholds, but the confidence intervals did not exclude clinically relevant differences; improvement from baseline did not differ between groups. There were no significant differences in VAS, FJS-12, overall satisfaction (9.32 vs. 9.31) or willingness to undergo surgery again (96.8% vs. 97.8%). Conclusions: Given insurance-based allocation, unequal follow-up and unadjusted analyses, robotic-assisted THA was associated with small differences in postoperative WOMAC and mHHS, whose point estimates were below the selected thresholds, although clinically relevant differences cannot be excluded; there were no differences in improvement, pain, joint awareness or satisfaction, which was very high in both groups. These findings do not establish a causal effect of robotic assistance; prospective randomized studies are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197721
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Satisfaction, Modest Differences: A Comparative Cohort Study of Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

José Luis País-Brito, Alejandro Herrera-Rodríguez, Jose Maria Lomo-Garrote, Juan José González-Álvarez et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

High Satisfaction, Modest Differences: A Comparative Cohort Study of Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

José Luis País-Brito, Alejandro Herrera-Rodríguez, Jose Maria Lomo-Garrote, Juan José González-Álvarez, Andrés Saldaña-Díaz, David González‐Martín, Francisco Del Canto-Iglesias
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (raTHA) improves the accuracy and reproducibility of acetabular component positioning compared with conventional THA (cTHA), but whether this translates into superior patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction remains debated. Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was performed, including all patients who underwent primary raTHA with the Mako system at our institution (September 2024–May 2025) and an equal-sized control group recruited consecutively from an alphabetically ordered list of 172 eligible cTHAs, starting from a randomly selected letter (August 2022–January 2025), with a minimum follow-up of one year. Treatment allocation was determined by insurance coverage. The postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was the primary outcome; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were secondary outcomes, and an overall satisfaction rating and willingness to undergo the surgery again were also recorded. Results: Ninety-three raTHA and 93 cTHA patients were analyzed. Follow-up was longer in the cTHA group (35.6 vs. 15.5 months; p < 0.001). Postoperative WOMAC (10.5 vs. 14.4; mean difference −3.8 points, 95% CI −7.4 to −0.2) and mHHS (86.9 vs. 84.7; mean difference 2.2 points, 95% CI −0.9 to 5.4) differed in rank-based comparisons, favoring raTHA (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.020 and p = 0.030, respectively). Point estimates were below the selected clinical-relevance thresholds, but the confidence intervals did not exclude clinically relevant differences; improvement from baseline did not differ between groups. There were no significant differences in VAS, FJS-12, overall satisfaction (9.32 vs. 9.31) or willingness to undergo surgery again (96.8% vs. 97.8%). Conclusions: Given insurance-based allocation, unequal follow-up and unadjusted analyses, robotic-assisted THA was associated with small differences in postoperative WOMAC and mHHS, whose point estimates were below the selected thresholds, although clinically relevant differences cannot be excluded; there were no differences in improvement, pain, joint awareness or satisfaction, which was very high in both groups. These findings do not establish a causal effect of robotic assistance; prospective randomized studies are needed.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(19)
Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES), Universidad Europea Miguel de Cervantes (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES), Hospital Recoletas Campo Grande (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.