Ten simple rules for preparing and delivering effective funding pitches in competitive grant applications

In grant applications, oral presentations can be an integral part of the evaluation process. Funding pitches are a specific form of pitch presentations delivered during competitive review procedures to complement a written proposal. Their goal is to convince reviewers of both your project's strength and excellence as well as your suitability as a researcher. This paper offers ten simple rules on how to prepare and deliver effective funding pitches, with a particular focus on content selection, clear structuring, and convincing scientific argumentation. We also highlight the importance of practice and feedback and share practical strategies on how to handle questions and critical discussion professionally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014840
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten simple rules for preparing and delivering effective funding pitches in competitive grant applications

Andy Göbel, Tilman D. Rachner
PLoS Computational Biology
Research, Science, and Academia
article

Ten simple rules for preparing and delivering effective funding pitches in competitive grant applications

Andy Göbel, Tilman D. Rachner
article en

Abstract

In grant applications, oral presentations can be an integral part of the evaluation process. Funding pitches are a specific form of pitch presentations delivered during competitive review procedures to complement a written proposal. Their goal is to convince reviewers of both your project's strength and excellence as well as your suitability as a researcher. This paper offers ten simple rules on how to prepare and deliver effective funding pitches, with a particular focus on content selection, clear structuring, and convincing scientific argumentation. We also highlight the importance of practice and feedback and share practical strategies on how to handle questions and critical discussion professionally.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 22(10)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Research, Science, and Academia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ten simple rules for preparing and delivering effective funding pitches in competitive grant applications — Andy Göbel, Tilman D. Rachner · PLoS Computational Biology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS