Innovations in Microsurgery: A Qualitative Appraisal of a Novel 3D-Printed Microscope

Background Microsurgery is a critical component of plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, the high cost of training and equipment pose significant barriers, particularly in resource-limited settings. To address this challenge, the Microsurgery and Regenerative Medicine Lab within the Division of Plastic Surgery at the University of Wisconsin developed a low-cost, 3D-printed surgical microscope. This study qualitatively appraised the use of this novel microscope for microsurgery training by surveying surgeons about their experiences using this tool relative to traditional magnification methods. Methods In this prospective, multi-institutional appraisal study, surgical residents, fellows, and attending surgeons with varying microsurgical experience performed a single end-to-end microsurgical anastomosis on chicken thigh femoral arteries using the 3D-printed microscope. Participants then completed a survey assessing ease of use, adequacy for microsurgical training, educational value, and perceived impact on teaching capacity in local and global settings. Results Over 80% of participants reported that performing an end-to-end anastomosis was easier or equivalent using the 3D-printed microscope compared to surgical loupes. All respondents expressed willingness to use the device for microsurgery teaching and practice. Additionally, 91.7% (33/36) believed access to the microscope would enhance microsurgical teaching at their home institutions, and 97.1% (34/35) felt it would improve teaching capacity in globally. Qualitative feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with suggestions primarily related to ergonomics and lighting. Conclusion This study supports that this low-cost, 3D-printed microscope is an effective microsurgical training tool. Ongoing design refinements informed by user feedback may further optimize its role in expanding access to microsurgery education worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2972-6217
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovations in Microsurgery: A Qualitative Appraisal of a Novel 3D-Printed Microscope

Ellen C. Shaffrey, Weifeng Zeng, Aaron M. Dingle, Emily E. Zona et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Innovations in Microsurgery: A Qualitative Appraisal of a Novel 3D-Printed Microscope

Ellen C. Shaffrey, Weifeng Zeng, Aaron M. Dingle, Emily E. Zona, Elizabeth P. Wu, Sahand Eftekari, Myiah Phuong Kim Quach, M Kristine Carbullido
article en

Abstract

Background Microsurgery is a critical component of plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, the high cost of training and equipment pose significant barriers, particularly in resource-limited settings. To address this challenge, the Microsurgery and Regenerative Medicine Lab within the Division of Plastic Surgery at the University of Wisconsin developed a low-cost, 3D-printed surgical microscope. This study qualitatively appraised the use of this novel microscope for microsurgery training by surveying surgeons about their experiences using this tool relative to traditional magnification methods. Methods In this prospective, multi-institutional appraisal study, surgical residents, fellows, and attending surgeons with varying microsurgical experience performed a single end-to-end microsurgical anastomosis on chicken thigh femoral arteries using the 3D-printed microscope. Participants then completed a survey assessing ease of use, adequacy for microsurgical training, educational value, and perceived impact on teaching capacity in local and global settings. Results Over 80% of participants reported that performing an end-to-end anastomosis was easier or equivalent using the 3D-printed microscope compared to surgical loupes. All respondents expressed willingness to use the device for microsurgery teaching and practice. Additionally, 91.7% (33/36) believed access to the microscope would enhance microsurgical teaching at their home institutions, and 97.1% (34/35) felt it would improve teaching capacity in globally. Qualitative feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with suggestions primarily related to ergonomics and lighting. Conclusion This study supports that this low-cost, 3D-printed microscope is an effective microsurgical training tool. Ongoing design refinements informed by user feedback may further optimize its role in expanding access to microsurgery education worldwide.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Mayo Clinic (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), UW Health University Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), University of Wisconsin Health (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.