Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Binge‐Eating Disorder in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized pilot trial of group‐based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for binge eating disorder (BED) in individuals with type 2 diabetes, and to estimate exploratory clinical outcomes to inform the design of a future efficacy trial. Method Thirty‐four participants with type 2 diabetes and BED were randomized 1:1 to group CBT or waitlist. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, randomization, intervention adherence, and follow‐up completion. Exploratory clinical outcomes were analyzed using an intention‐to‐treat mixed model, with weekly binge‐eating episodes evaluated as the primary clinical outcome for a future efficacy trial. Other exploratory clinical outcomes included other BED symptoms and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Results Recruitment was resource‐intensive, with 2646 individuals screened to randomize 34 participants. Randomization was completed as planned, but treatment initiation and follow‐up completion were lower in the group CBT arm. Postintervention data on weekly binge‐eating episodes were available for 11/17 participants in the CBT group and 16/17 in the waitlist group. This differential follow‐up may have introduced attrition bias. The exploratory between‐group estimate for binge‐eating episodes favored group CBT, with an adjusted difference in change of −2 episodes per week (95% CI: −4.81 to 0.68), corresponding to Cohen's d = −0.62 (95% CI: −1.45 to 0.21). Exploratory clinical outcome estimates were intended to inform future trial design rather than to test efficacy. Discussion Group CBT delivery appeared acceptable among participants who initiated treatment, but recruitment and follow‐up require refinement before proceeding to a future efficacy trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70232
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Binge‐Eating Disorder in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Mia Beck Lichtenstein, René Klinkby Støving, Michael Roeder, Jakob Linnet et al.
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Binge‐Eating Disorder in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Mia Beck Lichtenstein, René Klinkby Støving, Michael Roeder, Jakob Linnet, Pernille Fiil Nybo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized pilot trial of group‐based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for binge eating disorder (BED) in individuals with type 2 diabetes, and to estimate exploratory clinical outcomes to inform the design of a future efficacy trial. Method Thirty‐four participants with type 2 diabetes and BED were randomized 1:1 to group CBT or waitlist. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, randomization, intervention adherence, and follow‐up completion. Exploratory clinical outcomes were analyzed using an intention‐to‐treat mixed model, with weekly binge‐eating episodes evaluated as the primary clinical outcome for a future efficacy trial. Other exploratory clinical outcomes included other BED symptoms and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Results Recruitment was resource‐intensive, with 2646 individuals screened to randomize 34 participants. Randomization was completed as planned, but treatment initiation and follow‐up completion were lower in the group CBT arm. Postintervention data on weekly binge‐eating episodes were available for 11/17 participants in the CBT group and 16/17 in the waitlist group. This differential follow‐up may have introduced attrition bias. The exploratory between‐group estimate for binge‐eating episodes favored group CBT, with an adjusted difference in change of −2 episodes per week (95% CI: −4.81 to 0.68), corresponding to Cohen's d = −0.62 (95% CI: −1.45 to 0.21). Exploratory clinical outcome estimates were intended to inform future trial design rather than to test efficacy. Discussion Group CBT delivery appeared acceptable among participants who initiated treatment, but recruitment and follow‐up require refinement before proceeding to a future efficacy trial.

International Journal of Eating Disorders
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.