Salience-driven mispricing in retail-dominated markets: evidence from Korea

This study examines whether salience theory explains stock returns in the Korean market from 2005 to 2024. We find a robust negative relationship between the salience of past returns (ST) and future stock returns. A long-short portfolio sorting on ST generates a significant four-factor alpha of −1.50% per month (t-stat = −5.91). We show that the effect is almost entirely driven by the trading of individual investors; the ST effect is pronounced in stocks heavily purchased by retail investors but is absent in stocks favored by institutions. Also, the ST-return relation is significantly stronger during periods of market-wide short-sale bans and for stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility. Finally, this relation is pronounced under low sentiment or high uncertainty states. Our results extend the salience-based asset pricing literature beyond developed markets and suggest that behavioral biases may be amplified in emerging market contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies 선물연구
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jdqs-03-2026-0017
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Salience-driven mispricing in retail-dominated markets: evidence from Korea

Jihoon Goh, Donghoon Kim
Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies 선물연구
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Salience-driven mispricing in retail-dominated markets: evidence from Korea

Jihoon Goh, Donghoon Kim
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether salience theory explains stock returns in the Korean market from 2005 to 2024. We find a robust negative relationship between the salience of past returns (ST) and future stock returns. A long-short portfolio sorting on ST generates a significant four-factor alpha of −1.50% per month (t-stat = −5.91). We show that the effect is almost entirely driven by the trading of individual investors; the ST effect is pronounced in stocks heavily purchased by retail investors but is absent in stocks favored by institutions. Also, the ST-return relation is significantly stronger during periods of market-wide short-sale bans and for stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility. Finally, this relation is pronounced under low sentiment or high uncertainty states. Our results extend the salience-based asset pricing literature beyond developed markets and suggest that behavioral biases may be amplified in emerging market contexts.

Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies 선물연구
Pusan National University (KR), Dankook University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.