Development and pilot evaluation of a long-stay patient infection prevention and control risk stratification tool: A single-centre service evaluation

Background Long-stay inpatients accumulate modifiable healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) risks. Structured infection prevention and control (IPC) review processes specifically targeting these risks in long-stay inpatients are uncommon. Aim To evaluate the feasibility of a structured long-stay patient IPC review tool designed to identify and reduce modifiable HCAI risk in adult inpatients with prolonged hospitalisation. Methods This service evaluation was conducted across four adult inpatient wards in an acute NHS hospital in England between January and April 2026. Patients with a length of stay of at least 14 days underwent IPC review using an 11-item binary tool generating a total risk score (TRS; range of 0–11). Modifiable IPC risks were identified, and recommendations were communicated to ward teams, with patients re-reviewed according to risk level. Paired analysis compared initial and final follow-up TRS where repeat reviews were available. Results Fifty-two patients were reviewed across 84 review episodes, comprising 52 initial and 32 follow-up reviews. Eighteen patients contributed to the paired analysis. Mean TRS decreased from 3.33 to 2.17 between initial and final review, indicating a reduction in modifiable IPC risk. Eleven patients (61.1%) improved, while six (33.3%) were unchanged. The proportion classified as low risk increased from 61.1 to 83.3% following IPC review and intervention. Discussion This study demonstrated that a structured long-stay patient review framework could be integrated into routine IPC practice to identify and target modifiable IPC risk factors in prolonged hospital admissions. Significance and impact The findings highlight the potential role of structured long-stay review processes within preventive and predictive IPC practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Infection Prevention
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774261495775
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and pilot evaluation of a long-stay patient infection prevention and control risk stratification tool: A single-centre service evaluation

Aiden J. Plant, Harmony Owhotake, Stefano Oggiano, Jossy Ashlin et al.
Journal of Infection Prevention
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Development and pilot evaluation of a long-stay patient infection prevention and control risk stratification tool: A single-centre service evaluation

Aiden J. Plant, Harmony Owhotake, Stefano Oggiano, Jossy Ashlin, Michelle Bonney-Wheate
article en

Abstract

Background Long-stay inpatients accumulate modifiable healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) risks. Structured infection prevention and control (IPC) review processes specifically targeting these risks in long-stay inpatients are uncommon. Aim To evaluate the feasibility of a structured long-stay patient IPC review tool designed to identify and reduce modifiable HCAI risk in adult inpatients with prolonged hospitalisation. Methods This service evaluation was conducted across four adult inpatient wards in an acute NHS hospital in England between January and April 2026. Patients with a length of stay of at least 14 days underwent IPC review using an 11-item binary tool generating a total risk score (TRS; range of 0–11). Modifiable IPC risks were identified, and recommendations were communicated to ward teams, with patients re-reviewed according to risk level. Paired analysis compared initial and final follow-up TRS where repeat reviews were available. Results Fifty-two patients were reviewed across 84 review episodes, comprising 52 initial and 32 follow-up reviews. Eighteen patients contributed to the paired analysis. Mean TRS decreased from 3.33 to 2.17 between initial and final review, indicating a reduction in modifiable IPC risk. Eleven patients (61.1%) improved, while six (33.3%) were unchanged. The proportion classified as low risk increased from 61.1 to 83.3% following IPC review and intervention. Discussion This study demonstrated that a structured long-stay patient review framework could be integrated into routine IPC practice to identify and target modifiable IPC risk factors in prolonged hospital admissions. Significance and impact The findings highlight the potential role of structured long-stay review processes within preventive and predictive IPC practice.

Journal of Infection Prevention
Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.