The Listening Practitioner: Behind the Scenes of Organizational Listening Processes and Practices

Organizations that actively listen to stakeholders often face the same public criticism as those that do not. This paradox highlights a core challenge: despite dedicating resources to organizational listening, practitioners must navigate a complex web of conflicting viewpoints both internally and externally. While existing literature emphasizes the theoretical importance of stakeholder voice in decision-making, empirical research on communication practitioners’ daily realities of organizational listening processes and practices remains scarce. Acknowledging this complexity, this study explores two primary questions: (1) What are the current processes and practices of organizational listening? and (2) How do practitioners negotiate competing organizational and stakeholder expectations? Through in-depth interviews with 28 public relations and communication practitioners in Australia, this research identifies several key dynamics. Findings highlight the tension between stakeholder- and organization-centric goals; the expansive responsibilities of practitioners from listening system design to feedback implementation; the relational skills required to bridge gaps; strategies for capturing diverse perspectives; and methods for evaluating listening effectiveness. Ultimately, these findings illuminate how practitioners manage the intricacies of organizational listening in pursuit of mutual understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Listening
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2026.2743867
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Listening Practitioner: Behind the Scenes of Organizational Listening Processes and Practices

Helen Hutchings, Lisa Tam, Soojin Kim
International Journal of Listening
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

The Listening Practitioner: Behind the Scenes of Organizational Listening Processes and Practices

Helen Hutchings, Lisa Tam, Soojin Kim
article en

Abstract

Organizations that actively listen to stakeholders often face the same public criticism as those that do not. This paradox highlights a core challenge: despite dedicating resources to organizational listening, practitioners must navigate a complex web of conflicting viewpoints both internally and externally. While existing literature emphasizes the theoretical importance of stakeholder voice in decision-making, empirical research on communication practitioners’ daily realities of organizational listening processes and practices remains scarce. Acknowledging this complexity, this study explores two primary questions: (1) What are the current processes and practices of organizational listening? and (2) How do practitioners negotiate competing organizational and stakeholder expectations? Through in-depth interviews with 28 public relations and communication practitioners in Australia, this research identifies several key dynamics. Findings highlight the tension between stakeholder- and organization-centric goals; the expansive responsibilities of practitioners from listening system design to feedback implementation; the relational skills required to bridge gaps; strategies for capturing diverse perspectives; and methods for evaluating listening effectiveness. Ultimately, these findings illuminate how practitioners manage the intricacies of organizational listening in pursuit of mutual understanding.

International Journal of Listening
Queensland University of Technology (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Phillips 66 (United States) (US), Phillips University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.