Financial Waste is Patient Harm: Reducing Wasteful Healthcare Spending Increases Safety and Health

Wasteful healthcare spending has more than economic costs—there are clinical costs as well. Waste increases out-of-pocket costs, delays necessary care, and worsens outcomes. We argue that, while most quality frameworks do not consider this patient harm, they should. Financial waste is clinically on par with medical errors and adverse events, as overtreatment and low-value care injure patients, care coordination failures lead to preventable complications and death, pricing failures cause delayed and complicated care, and low-value procedures cause complications. We reviewed the literature to tie financial waste, toxicity, and pollution to patient harm across 4 domains: care delivery, care coordination, overtreatment or low-value care, and pricing failure. Even with insurance, healthcare is unaffordable for most Americans, leading to delayed care and lower quality of life. Solutions exist, and specialty care platforms have successfully employed strategies to offset patient harm. Including financial harm in quality frameworks increases the urgency to address financial waste.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Management in Health Care
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/qmh.0000000000000587
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial Waste is Patient Harm: Reducing Wasteful Healthcare Spending Increases Safety and Health

Jason Tibbels, Andrew Doy
Quality Management in Health Care
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

Financial Waste is Patient Harm: Reducing Wasteful Healthcare Spending Increases Safety and Health

Jason Tibbels, Andrew Doy
article en

Abstract

Wasteful healthcare spending has more than economic costs—there are clinical costs as well. Waste increases out-of-pocket costs, delays necessary care, and worsens outcomes. We argue that, while most quality frameworks do not consider this patient harm, they should. Financial waste is clinically on par with medical errors and adverse events, as overtreatment and low-value care injure patients, care coordination failures lead to preventable complications and death, pricing failures cause delayed and complicated care, and low-value procedures cause complications. We reviewed the literature to tie financial waste, toxicity, and pollution to patient harm across 4 domains: care delivery, care coordination, overtreatment or low-value care, and pricing failure. Even with insurance, healthcare is unaffordable for most Americans, leading to delayed care and lower quality of life. Solutions exist, and specialty care platforms have successfully employed strategies to offset patient harm. Including financial harm in quality frameworks increases the urgency to address financial waste.

Quality Management in Health Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Financial Waste is Patient Harm: Reducing Wasteful Healthcare Spending Increases Safety and Health — Jason Tibbels, Andrew Doy · Quality Management in Health Care (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS