Reporting of Sociodemographic and Equity-Related Factors in Emergency Department Pain Trials for Children: A Scoping Review

Context: Effective management of children’s acute pain in emergency departments (EDs) is essential, yet health disparities exist. The applicability of evidence to diverse pediatric populations depends on clear demographic reporting. The PROGRESS-Plus framework identifies social determinants of health that influence care and outcomes, but it is unclear to what extent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric ED pain management report these variables. Objective: This scoping review examines the frequency and completeness of PROGRESS-Plus reporting in RCTs evaluating acute pain interventions for children in EDs in Canada and the USA. Data Sources: Using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the Participant, Concept, Context framework, we conducted a scoping review of RCTs published between 2013 and 2025. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched using a peer-reviewed strategy. Study Selection: Eligible studies involved children and youth experiencing acute presenting or procedural pain in ED settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data Extraction: Data were extracted using standardized forms refined with input from patient partners. Narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics were applied to summarize PROGRESS-Plus reporting. Results: Of 3667 records identified, 65 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Thirty-five studies focused on procedural pain interventions, and 30 on interventions for painful presentations. Age was reported in all studies, and gender and/or sex in 98%. Race and/or ethnicity was reported in 40%, and chronic illness and/or disability in 18%. No studies reported socioeconomic status or place of residence. Conclusions: RCTs addressing pediatric pain in the ED rarely report equity-relevant demographic variables beyond age and gender and/or sex, limiting assessment of intervention effectiveness across diverse populations. Standardized demographic reporting is needed to support equitable, evidence-based pain research and care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Emergency Care
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003717
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting of Sociodemographic and Equity-Related Factors in Emergency Department Pain Trials for Children: A Scoping Review

Lisa Hartling, Samina Ali, Jaspreet K. Khangura, Shannon Marie Ruzycki et al.
Pediatric Emergency Care
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Reporting of Sociodemographic and Equity-Related Factors in Emergency Department Pain Trials for Children: A Scoping Review

Lisa Hartling, Samina Ali, Jaspreet K. Khangura, Shannon Marie Ruzycki, Maria J. Mayan, Tehseen Ladha, Sarah Alexandra Elliott, Patricia Candelaria, Elise Kammerer, Shannon D. Scott, Liz Dennett, Lexyn Iliscupidez, Calveen Basi, Zoe Zelyck, Sahra Kaahiye, Leilani Sapon
article en

Abstract

Context: Effective management of children’s acute pain in emergency departments (EDs) is essential, yet health disparities exist. The applicability of evidence to diverse pediatric populations depends on clear demographic reporting. The PROGRESS-Plus framework identifies social determinants of health that influence care and outcomes, but it is unclear to what extent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric ED pain management report these variables. Objective: This scoping review examines the frequency and completeness of PROGRESS-Plus reporting in RCTs evaluating acute pain interventions for children in EDs in Canada and the USA. Data Sources: Using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the Participant, Concept, Context framework, we conducted a scoping review of RCTs published between 2013 and 2025. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched using a peer-reviewed strategy. Study Selection: Eligible studies involved children and youth experiencing acute presenting or procedural pain in ED settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data Extraction: Data were extracted using standardized forms refined with input from patient partners. Narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics were applied to summarize PROGRESS-Plus reporting. Results: Of 3667 records identified, 65 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Thirty-five studies focused on procedural pain interventions, and 30 on interventions for painful presentations. Age was reported in all studies, and gender and/or sex in 98%. Race and/or ethnicity was reported in 40%, and chronic illness and/or disability in 18%. No studies reported socioeconomic status or place of residence. Conclusions: RCTs addressing pediatric pain in the ED rarely report equity-relevant demographic variables beyond age and gender and/or sex, limiting assessment of intervention effectiveness across diverse populations. Standardized demographic reporting is needed to support equitable, evidence-based pain research and care.

Pediatric Emergency Care
University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.