Vascular device practices in extremely preterm infants: an international cross-sectional survey

Abstract Objective To explore global practices in vascular device selection, securement, and monitoring for extremely preterm infants, and to assess regional variation. Study design A web-based cross-sectional survey was completed by one respondent per neonatal unit. Result We received 848 responses from 100 countries. Guideline availability varied: 85–98% for umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) and 29–97% for peripheral intravenous catheters. UVCs were the preferred initial vascular device at 23 to 26 weeks (70% and 63%, respectively). Transparent film dressings for peripheral catheters and Wharton’s jelly stitch for UVCs were the commonest securement methods. Peripherally inserted central catheter sites were assessed at intervals of < 8 h in 56% (434/780) units, and 58% (490/848) units did not use an extravasation injury detection tool. Guideline availability was two-fold higher in units caring for 22–23 vs 24–25 weeks’ gestation. Conclusion Significant global variation exists, highlighting the need for standardized, evidence-based vascular care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-026-02892-7
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vascular device practices in extremely preterm infants: an international cross-sectional survey

Wenhao Zhou, Vibhuti S Shah, Pranav R. Jani, Duygu Gözen et al.
Journal of Perinatology
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Vascular device practices in extremely preterm infants: an international cross-sectional survey

Wenhao Zhou, Vibhuti S Shah, Pranav R. Jani, Duygu Gözen, Sabrina de Souza, Deanne L. August, M. Satardien, A. Priyadarshi, A. Wright, R. Maheshwari, J. Buchmayer, D. Shah, U. Mishra, S. Godambe, J. Moore, K. Walker, FC Cheah, A. Khashana, X. Hu, U. Vaidya, M. Culcer, J. Marceau, J. Oei, D. D’Çruz, K. Lowe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To explore global practices in vascular device selection, securement, and monitoring for extremely preterm infants, and to assess regional variation. Study design A web-based cross-sectional survey was completed by one respondent per neonatal unit. Result We received 848 responses from 100 countries. Guideline availability varied: 85–98% for umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) and 29–97% for peripheral intravenous catheters. UVCs were the preferred initial vascular device at 23 to 26 weeks (70% and 63%, respectively). Transparent film dressings for peripheral catheters and Wharton’s jelly stitch for UVCs were the commonest securement methods. Peripherally inserted central catheter sites were assessed at intervals of < 8 h in 56% (434/780) units, and 58% (490/848) units did not use an extravasation injury detection tool. Guideline availability was two-fold higher in units caring for 22–23 vs 24–25 weeks’ gestation. Conclusion Significant global variation exists, highlighting the need for standardized, evidence-based vascular care.

Journal of Perinatology
Suez Canal University (EG), Griffith University (AU), Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), The University of Sydney (AU), Koç University (TR), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Royal Hospital for Women (AU), Tygerberg Hospital (ZA), Westmead Hospital (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Connecticut Children's Medical Center (US), Mater Mothers' Hospital (AU), King Edward Memorial Hospital Research Centre (IN), Children's Hospital of Fudan University (CN), UConn Health (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.