Scholarly ties in innovation and entrepreneurship: a social network perspective

Purpose This study examines the patterns of scholarly communication on social media, specifically Twitter (now “X”), among researchers in innovation management and entrepreneurship. The research aims to identify how these communities interact and share knowledge, revealing their similarities and distinctions. It employs social network analysis to uncover novel communication trends within these scholarly fields beyond previous bibliometric evidence. Design/methodology/approach Social network analysis is employed using Twitter data from 2007 to 2023 for 519 highly-cited innovation and entrepreneurship scholars. Louvain and Infomap clustering algorithms are applied to create communication graphs, which are then analyzed to reveal scholars’ interaction patterns. This research takes a comprehensive approach by considering multiple types of interactions (follows, retweets, mentions) to provide a thorough view of the social network. Findings Clustering uncovers six communities of scholars, revealing a well-defined structure in scholarly communications. Although interconnected, a clear distinction can be shown between the communities of innovation management and entrepreneurship on Twitter. Furthermore, 8% of scholars act as bridges between innovation and entrepreneurship, indicating significant interdisciplinary interaction. Originality/value This study contributes to the understanding of how scholars in the fields of innovation management and entrepreneurship communicate and collaborate via social media. By utilizing Twitter-based social network analysis, the research provides a novel perspective on the dynamics of scholarly communication beyond traditional publishing channels. These insights offer practical implications for academic collaboration by identifying bridging scholars and for field development monitoring by revealing how innovation management and entrepreneurship consolidate, fragment and evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-10-2024-0513
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scholarly ties in innovation and entrepreneurship: a social network perspective

Katharina Hölzle, Anne Radunski, Valeska Maul, Jonas Umland et al.
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Scholarly ties in innovation and entrepreneurship: a social network perspective

Katharina Hölzle, Anne Radunski, Valeska Maul, Jonas Umland, Robert Rose
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the patterns of scholarly communication on social media, specifically Twitter (now “X”), among researchers in innovation management and entrepreneurship. The research aims to identify how these communities interact and share knowledge, revealing their similarities and distinctions. It employs social network analysis to uncover novel communication trends within these scholarly fields beyond previous bibliometric evidence. Design/methodology/approach Social network analysis is employed using Twitter data from 2007 to 2023 for 519 highly-cited innovation and entrepreneurship scholars. Louvain and Infomap clustering algorithms are applied to create communication graphs, which are then analyzed to reveal scholars’ interaction patterns. This research takes a comprehensive approach by considering multiple types of interactions (follows, retweets, mentions) to provide a thorough view of the social network. Findings Clustering uncovers six communities of scholars, revealing a well-defined structure in scholarly communications. Although interconnected, a clear distinction can be shown between the communities of innovation management and entrepreneurship on Twitter. Furthermore, 8% of scholars act as bridges between innovation and entrepreneurship, indicating significant interdisciplinary interaction. Originality/value This study contributes to the understanding of how scholars in the fields of innovation management and entrepreneurship communicate and collaborate via social media. By utilizing Twitter-based social network analysis, the research provides a novel perspective on the dynamics of scholarly communication beyond traditional publishing channels. These insights offer practical implications for academic collaboration by identifying bridging scholars and for field development monitoring by revealing how innovation management and entrepreneurship consolidate, fragment and evolve.

Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (DE), Human Factors (Norway) (NO), Applied Human Factors (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.