3D ‐Printed Bioadhesive Interfaces as Proliferative Niches for Tissue Repair

ABSTRACT Bioadhesives have traditionally been viewed as materials for wound closure, sealing and haemostasis However, in tissue repair they also create the first engineered interface that influences cell retention, microenvironmental homeostasis and subsequent remodelling Recent advances in 3D printing are shifting bioadhesives from passive, uniform layers to architecturally controlled interfaces with spatially programmable chemistry, mechanics, transport and biological function. In this Review, we propose an interface‐centred framework in which qualifying 3D‐printed bioadhesive interfaces function as proliferative niches. Such interfaces require stable host‐tissue adhesion and a biocompatible, cell‐permissive microenvironment. They should also measurably support cell survival, context‐appropriate proliferation and constructive remodelling in defined target‐cell populations. We summarize the key design principles that govern proliferative‐niche formation, with printability‐aware fabrication treated as a cross‐cutting prerequisite for implementing interfacial adhesion, mechanical matching, mass transport, surface chemistry and temporal evolution. We then discuss the mechanistic basis through which printed bioadhesive interfaces regulate early protein adsorption, immune activation, mechanotransduction, metabolic exchange and long‐term remodelling trajectories. Representative application contexts, including sealing and haemostasis musculoskeletal repair, wearable and implantable biointerfaces and organoid‐related in vitro models, are examined to highlight application‐specific opportunities and trade‐offs. We further outline emerging evaluation and modelling frameworks that move beyond adhesion strength towards multidimensional assessment, cross‐scale structure–property–function mapping and data‐driven predictive design. By reframing bioadhesives as active interfacial regulators rather than passive fixation materials, this Review provides a conceptual framework for engineering 3D‐printed bioadhesives that not only adhere and seal, but also actively guide constructive tissue repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Proliferation
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.70286
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D ‐Printed Bioadhesive Interfaces as Proliferative Niches for Tissue Repair

Zhen Gu, Qi Gu, Yongqiang Wen, Guoshi Xu et al.
Cell Proliferation
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

3D ‐Printed Bioadhesive Interfaces as Proliferative Niches for Tissue Repair

Zhen Gu, Qi Gu, Yongqiang Wen, Guoshi Xu, Xinyong Su
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bioadhesives have traditionally been viewed as materials for wound closure, sealing and haemostasis However, in tissue repair they also create the first engineered interface that influences cell retention, microenvironmental homeostasis and subsequent remodelling Recent advances in 3D printing are shifting bioadhesives from passive, uniform layers to architecturally controlled interfaces with spatially programmable chemistry, mechanics, transport and biological function. In this Review, we propose an interface‐centred framework in which qualifying 3D‐printed bioadhesive interfaces function as proliferative niches. Such interfaces require stable host‐tissue adhesion and a biocompatible, cell‐permissive microenvironment. They should also measurably support cell survival, context‐appropriate proliferation and constructive remodelling in defined target‐cell populations. We summarize the key design principles that govern proliferative‐niche formation, with printability‐aware fabrication treated as a cross‐cutting prerequisite for implementing interfacial adhesion, mechanical matching, mass transport, surface chemistry and temporal evolution. We then discuss the mechanistic basis through which printed bioadhesive interfaces regulate early protein adsorption, immune activation, mechanotransduction, metabolic exchange and long‐term remodelling trajectories. Representative application contexts, including sealing and haemostasis musculoskeletal repair, wearable and implantable biointerfaces and organoid‐related in vitro models, are examined to highlight application‐specific opportunities and trade‐offs. We further outline emerging evaluation and modelling frameworks that move beyond adhesion strength towards multidimensional assessment, cross‐scale structure–property–function mapping and data‐driven predictive design. By reframing bioadhesives as active interfacial regulators rather than passive fixation materials, this Review provides a conceptual framework for engineering 3D‐printed bioadhesives that not only adhere and seal, but also actively guide constructive tissue repair.

Cell Proliferation
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.