Weight Loss or Muscle Loss? Cellular Mechanisms and Clinical Strategies for Preserving Lean Mass During GLP ‐1‐Based Therapy

ABSTRACT Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and newer dual‐ and triple‐incretin receptor agonists have transformed obesity treatment by producing substantial and sustained weight loss. However, reported reductions in lean body mass have raised concerns about potential skeletal muscle loss and sarcopenia, particularly in older adults and individuals with limited muscle reserves. This review examines the cellular and tissue‐level mechanisms that may contribute to lean mass changes during GLP‐1‐based therapy and evaluates strategies for preserving skeletal muscle. Reductions in fat‐free or lean body mass should not be interpreted as equivalent to loss of contractile skeletal muscle, as these compartments also include body water, organs, connective tissue, and the fat‐free component of adipose tissue. Incretin‐based therapies predominantly reduce fat mass, while preclinical studies and limited human evidence suggest possible improvements in skeletal muscle quality through enhanced insulin sensitivity, reduced myosteatosis and inflammation, and favourable mitochondrial adaptations. Nevertheless, the proportion of lean mass reduction attributable to true skeletal muscle loss and its long‐term functional significance remain uncertain. Rapid weight loss and inadequate nutrient intake may increase the risk of clinically relevant muscle loss in susceptible populations. Individualized protein intake, progressive resistance exercise, management of gastrointestinal adverse effects, and functional monitoring therefore represent the reasonable strategies for skeletal muscle preservation. Emerging anabolic combination therapies remain investigational and should be evaluated using strength and physical performance outcomes in addition to body composition. Accordingly, this review explores the potential mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle changes during GLP‐1‐based therapy and discusses strategies to support muscle preservation during therapy‐induced weight loss. Ultimately, the success of GLP‐1‐based therapy should be defined not only by the magnitude of weight loss, but also by the extent of that weight loss and the preservation of skeletal muscle mass and function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71422
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weight Loss or Muscle Loss? Cellular Mechanisms and Clinical Strategies for Preserving Lean Mass During GLP ‐1‐Based Therapy

Fatma Uysal, Goksemin Fatma Sengul, Esma Sukurica
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Weight Loss or Muscle Loss? Cellular Mechanisms and Clinical Strategies for Preserving Lean Mass During GLP ‐1‐Based Therapy

Fatma Uysal, Goksemin Fatma Sengul, Esma Sukurica
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and newer dual‐ and triple‐incretin receptor agonists have transformed obesity treatment by producing substantial and sustained weight loss. However, reported reductions in lean body mass have raised concerns about potential skeletal muscle loss and sarcopenia, particularly in older adults and individuals with limited muscle reserves. This review examines the cellular and tissue‐level mechanisms that may contribute to lean mass changes during GLP‐1‐based therapy and evaluates strategies for preserving skeletal muscle. Reductions in fat‐free or lean body mass should not be interpreted as equivalent to loss of contractile skeletal muscle, as these compartments also include body water, organs, connective tissue, and the fat‐free component of adipose tissue. Incretin‐based therapies predominantly reduce fat mass, while preclinical studies and limited human evidence suggest possible improvements in skeletal muscle quality through enhanced insulin sensitivity, reduced myosteatosis and inflammation, and favourable mitochondrial adaptations. Nevertheless, the proportion of lean mass reduction attributable to true skeletal muscle loss and its long‐term functional significance remain uncertain. Rapid weight loss and inadequate nutrient intake may increase the risk of clinically relevant muscle loss in susceptible populations. Individualized protein intake, progressive resistance exercise, management of gastrointestinal adverse effects, and functional monitoring therefore represent the reasonable strategies for skeletal muscle preservation. Emerging anabolic combination therapies remain investigational and should be evaluated using strength and physical performance outcomes in addition to body composition. Accordingly, this review explores the potential mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle changes during GLP‐1‐based therapy and discusses strategies to support muscle preservation during therapy‐induced weight loss. Ultimately, the success of GLP‐1‐based therapy should be defined not only by the magnitude of weight loss, but also by the extent of that weight loss and the preservation of skeletal muscle mass and function.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Ankara University (TR), Ankara Medipol Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.