ULF-Geomagnetic Response at Mid-Latitudes in Relation to the Space Weather Parameters Observed During the Extreme Geomagnetic Storm of May 2024

The study focuses on the regional inhomogeneities of the spatial and temporal structures of the ULF geomagnetic disturbances (10–600 s) recorded in four geomagnetic observatories (EBR-Spain, WIC-Austria, NCK-Hungary, and PAG-Bulgaria) located at mid-latitudes in the European sector. These were caused by the extreme storm on 10–11 May 2024, which was the most powerful event since 2003. Polar lights, an extraordinary phenomenon inherent to these latitudes, were observed. We used established and powerful classical methods, such as the cross-correlation analysis, to obtain normalized cross-correlation functions between the total vector of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMFBtotal) and the geomagnetic field’s H-component, and that between the solar wind pressure and the H-component. Their respective maximal absolute values are −0.8 and −0.7. For all observatories, we determined a time delay of 240 min corresponding to the time required for the magnetosphere to reach maximum perturbation after the initial impact. We also determined delay periods (based on the cross-correlation function and latitude) between the different observatories that varied between 1 and 14 min for each pair of observatories. Using the wavelet coherence approach, we determined the degree of coherence between the six pairs of observatories and their phase differences in terms of time of occurrence and frequency. We unveiled significant phase discrepancies (0, π/2) and a low coherence in the region of Pc3-4 pulsations (10–150 s). Moreover, we found out that Pc5 pulsations (150–600 s) show no phase or frequency changes at the recording points. In contrast, for the waveform, we discovered that by applying a band-pass filter based on the fast Fourier transform, the disturbances in the Pc3-4 range alter their waveform relative to the different measurement points and phases of the storm. However, this tendency is not detected in the Pc5 range at mid-latitudes in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17100981
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ULF-Geomagnetic Response at Mid-Latitudes in Relation to the Space Weather Parameters Observed During the Extreme Geomagnetic Storm of May 2024

Petya Trifonova, Metodi Metodiev, Maria Chamati, Borislav Andonov
Atmosphere
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

ULF-Geomagnetic Response at Mid-Latitudes in Relation to the Space Weather Parameters Observed During the Extreme Geomagnetic Storm of May 2024

Petya Trifonova, Metodi Metodiev, Maria Chamati, Borislav Andonov
article en

Abstract

The study focuses on the regional inhomogeneities of the spatial and temporal structures of the ULF geomagnetic disturbances (10–600 s) recorded in four geomagnetic observatories (EBR-Spain, WIC-Austria, NCK-Hungary, and PAG-Bulgaria) located at mid-latitudes in the European sector. These were caused by the extreme storm on 10–11 May 2024, which was the most powerful event since 2003. Polar lights, an extraordinary phenomenon inherent to these latitudes, were observed. We used established and powerful classical methods, such as the cross-correlation analysis, to obtain normalized cross-correlation functions between the total vector of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMFBtotal) and the geomagnetic field’s H-component, and that between the solar wind pressure and the H-component. Their respective maximal absolute values are −0.8 and −0.7. For all observatories, we determined a time delay of 240 min corresponding to the time required for the magnetosphere to reach maximum perturbation after the initial impact. We also determined delay periods (based on the cross-correlation function and latitude) between the different observatories that varied between 1 and 14 min for each pair of observatories. Using the wavelet coherence approach, we determined the degree of coherence between the six pairs of observatories and their phase differences in terms of time of occurrence and frequency. We unveiled significant phase discrepancies (0, π/2) and a low coherence in the region of Pc3-4 pulsations (10–150 s). Moreover, we found out that Pc5 pulsations (150–600 s) show no phase or frequency changes at the recording points. In contrast, for the waveform, we discovered that by applying a band-pass filter based on the fast Fourier transform, the disturbances in the Pc3-4 range alter their waveform relative to the different measurement points and phases of the storm. However, this tendency is not detected in the Pc5 range at mid-latitudes in Europe.

AtmosphereVol. 17(10)
National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.