Insights from co-design for relational policy-making: Farm animal health and welfare policy in the UK

IMPACTThis article offers practical lessons for policy-makers working in contested, low-trust environments. It shows that co-design can build trust only when participation is supported by relational practices such as shared leadership, peer challenge and clear principles of engagement. It also highlights a common risk in public administration: trust generated during the co-design process can quickly erode if delivery systems, fiscal rules and organizational structures are not aligned with what was agreed. The findings therefore suggest that governments should invest not only in co-design processes, but also in the institutional conditions to enable collaborative innovation needed to carry relational commitments into implementation and throughout the full policy cycle leading to a long-term sector transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2739980
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights from co-design for relational policy-making: Farm animal health and welfare policy in the UK

Olga Siemers, Jimmy Lindqvist
Public Money & Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Insights from co-design for relational policy-making: Farm animal health and welfare policy in the UK

Olga Siemers, Jimmy Lindqvist
article en

Abstract

IMPACTThis article offers practical lessons for policy-makers working in contested, low-trust environments. It shows that co-design can build trust only when participation is supported by relational practices such as shared leadership, peer challenge and clear principles of engagement. It also highlights a common risk in public administration: trust generated during the co-design process can quickly erode if delivery systems, fiscal rules and organizational structures are not aligned with what was agreed. The findings therefore suggest that governments should invest not only in co-design processes, but also in the institutional conditions to enable collaborative innovation needed to carry relational commitments into implementation and throughout the full policy cycle leading to a long-term sector transformation.

Public Money & Management
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Insights from co-design for relational policy-making: Farm animal health and welfare policy in the UK — Olga Siemers, Jimmy Lindqvist · Public Money & Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS