New potassium binders: we need them - we do not need them

Abstract New potassium binders may facilitate contemporary chronic kidney disease care by controlling hyperkalemia and thereby facilitating the continued use of kidney- and cardioprotective therapies, particularly renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. The opposing view is that sodium polystyrene sulfonate remains effective, familiar, inexpensive, and often well tolerated, while direct comparative evidence has not yet shown clinically meaningful superiority of newer binders. This debate weighs clinical utility, comparative efficacy, safety, and cost, concluding that new binders are valuable options but that their routine replacement of established low-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate and the need for potassium binders beyond optimized diuretic therapy, acidosis control, diet etc. requires stronger comparative evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfag360
Primary Topic
Potassium and Related Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New potassium binders: we need them - we do not need them

Luca De Nicola, Juergen Floege, Carmine Zoccali, Marie Evans
Clinical Kidney Journal
Potassium and Related Disorders
article

New potassium binders: we need them - we do not need them

Luca De Nicola, Juergen Floege, Carmine Zoccali, Marie Evans
article en

Abstract

Abstract New potassium binders may facilitate contemporary chronic kidney disease care by controlling hyperkalemia and thereby facilitating the continued use of kidney- and cardioprotective therapies, particularly renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. The opposing view is that sodium polystyrene sulfonate remains effective, familiar, inexpensive, and often well tolerated, while direct comparative evidence has not yet shown clinically meaningful superiority of newer binders. This debate weighs clinical utility, comparative efficacy, safety, and cost, concluding that new binders are valuable options but that their routine replacement of established low-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate and the need for potassium binders beyond optimized diuretic therapy, acidosis control, diet etc. requires stronger comparative evidence.

Clinical Kidney Journal
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Biogem (IT), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Renal Research Institute (US), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Potassium and Related Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New potassium binders: we need them - we do not need them — Luca De Nicola, Juergen Floege, et al. · Clinical Kidney Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS