Considerations and guidelines for photic measurement in field studies of the physiological effects of light

Abstract Guidelines for light measurement in laboratory studies of the non-visual effects of light have recently been put forward. Yet, outside of controlled environments, unique challenges necessitate additional consideration and modifications to those recommendations. The purpose of this paper is to build on prior work by outlining pre-ocular, ocular, and post-ocular factors and associated considerations that influence photic exposure and the physiological effects of light in the field. Practical constraints of applying laboratory measurement guidelines and tools and strategies for light measurement in field-based work are discussed in detail, including the trade-offs of different approaches. A standard operating procedure for measuring light in field studies is provided, with particular attention to managing sources of variability, along with an example that applies the procedure to a recent study. Finally, future directions and remaining challenges of photic measurement during field studies of sleep, circadian rhythms, and other non-visual effects of light are identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Biological Timing and Sleep
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44323-026-00110-3
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations and guidelines for photic measurement in field studies of the physiological effects of light

Sara C. Bessman, Gena L. Glickman, Morgan Pattison, Céline Vetter et al.
npj Biological Timing and Sleep
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
article

Considerations and guidelines for photic measurement in field studies of the physiological effects of light

Sara C. Bessman, Gena L. Glickman, Morgan Pattison, Céline Vetter, Elizabeth M. Harrison, Michael Herf, A Wilkerson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Guidelines for light measurement in laboratory studies of the non-visual effects of light have recently been put forward. Yet, outside of controlled environments, unique challenges necessitate additional consideration and modifications to those recommendations. The purpose of this paper is to build on prior work by outlining pre-ocular, ocular, and post-ocular factors and associated considerations that influence photic exposure and the physiological effects of light in the field. Practical constraints of applying laboratory measurement guidelines and tools and strategies for light measurement in field-based work are discussed in detail, including the trade-offs of different approaches. A standard operating procedure for measuring light in field studies is provided, with particular attention to managing sources of variability, along with an example that applies the procedure to a recent study. Finally, future directions and remaining challenges of photic measurement during field studies of sleep, circadian rhythms, and other non-visual effects of light are identified.

npj Biological Timing and SleepVol. 3(1)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Considerations and guidelines for photic measurement in field studies of the physiological effects of light — Sara C. Bessman, Gena L. Glickman, et al. · npj Biological Timing and Sleep (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS