From Antimicrobial Biomaterials to Infection-Resilient Interfaces: Engineering the Host, Microbe, and Material Interface Against Drug-Resistant Biofilms

Drug-resistant biofilm infections remain a major challenge for medical devices and implants. Biofilm formation can reduce antimicrobial effectiveness through physiological heterogeneity, tolerance, persistence, and interactions with the host and biomaterial surface. Antimicrobial biomaterials have been developed to prevent colonization, detect infection, provide antimicrobial activity, control established biofilms, and support tissue recovery. However, their performance depends on the biological context in which they function. This review examines these strategies through interactions among the host, microbe, and material, using carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as selected biological stress-test examples for evaluating biomaterial performance. It also considers the limitations in current evaluation, including planktonic testing, biological conditioning, microbial adaptation, effects on non-target microorganisms, material stability, manufacturing, and clinical translation. Antimicrobial activity alone does not establish effective performance in infection. Material function must match the microbial state, host environment, and intended clinical use while maintaining host compatibility and function during use. We propose infection resilience as a design framework organized around Prevent, Detect, Respond, Resolve, and Regenerate. Infection resilience refers to coordinated material performance under changing microbial and host conditions rather than the number of functions incorporated into a material. This framework offers a practical basis for more biologically relevant evaluation and purposeful design of antimicrobial biomaterials for drug-resistant biofilm infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16101670
Primary Topic
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Antimicrobial Biomaterials to Infection-Resilient Interfaces: Engineering the Host, Microbe, and Material Interface Against Drug-Resistant Biofilms

Ayman Elbehiry, Eman Marzouk, Fahad Albugami, Husam M. Edrees et al.
Life
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
article

From Antimicrobial Biomaterials to Infection-Resilient Interfaces: Engineering the Host, Microbe, and Material Interface Against Drug-Resistant Biofilms

Ayman Elbehiry, Eman Marzouk, Fahad Albugami, Husam M. Edrees, Faisal Yousuf, Abdulaziz Mohammed Almuzaini, Adil Abalkhail, Mai Ibrahem, Shaimaa Ashour, Abdulraheem Bayameen, Sulaiman Anagreyyah
article en

Abstract

Drug-resistant biofilm infections remain a major challenge for medical devices and implants. Biofilm formation can reduce antimicrobial effectiveness through physiological heterogeneity, tolerance, persistence, and interactions with the host and biomaterial surface. Antimicrobial biomaterials have been developed to prevent colonization, detect infection, provide antimicrobial activity, control established biofilms, and support tissue recovery. However, their performance depends on the biological context in which they function. This review examines these strategies through interactions among the host, microbe, and material, using carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as selected biological stress-test examples for evaluating biomaterial performance. It also considers the limitations in current evaluation, including planktonic testing, biological conditioning, microbial adaptation, effects on non-target microorganisms, material stability, manufacturing, and clinical translation. Antimicrobial activity alone does not establish effective performance in infection. Material function must match the microbial state, host environment, and intended clinical use while maintaining host compatibility and function during use. We propose infection resilience as a design framework organized around Prevent, Detect, Respond, Resolve, and Regenerate. Infection resilience refers to coordinated material performance under changing microbial and host conditions rather than the number of functions incorporated into a material. This framework offers a practical basis for more biologically relevant evaluation and purposeful design of antimicrobial biomaterials for drug-resistant biofilm infections.

LifeVol. 16(10)
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Qassim University (SA), King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (SA), University of Tabuk (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.