Effects of Rating of Perceived Exertion-based Deadlift Training on Muscle Performance: A Practical Approach to Program Design

Abstract Young, AD, Asthana, A, Stephan, JJ, Lee, SY, Newton, NJ, Newland, A, and Perkins, R. Effects of rating of perceived exertion-based deadlift training on muscle performance: A practical approach to program design. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The purpose of this study was to compare rate of perceived exertion (RPE)-based and fixed %-based deadlift training on muscle strength, fatigue, and body composition. We hypothesized that RPE-based training would yield superior adaptations. Subjects were randomly assigned to RPE- or %-based training (RPE: n = 12, 23.6 ± 1.6, %: n = 12, 25.2 ± 2.1 years, d = 0.327, p > 0.05). Training programs used identical set and repetition schemes but differed in load prescription. Maximum deadlift (DL 1RM) primary outcome and hand grip strength and body composition (dual x-ray absorptiometry) secondary outcomes were assessed before and after training. Fatigue estimates were collected throughout the study using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Nine subjects completed the intervention in each group. Data were analyzed using 2-way mixed-model ANOVAs and independent t -tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05 and effect sizes reported. Average DL training volume was similar between groups (RPE: 1,212 ± 159 kg/session, %: 1,338 ± 123 kg/session, d = 0.297, p > 0.05), whereas the % group completed more total training volume (RPE: 2,059 ± 325 kg/session, %: 4,496 ± 582 kg/session, d = 1.715, p < 0.05). Average relative training load was similar between groups (RPE: 82 ± 2% 1 repetition maximum (1RM), %: 80 ± 2% 1RM, d = 0.176, p > 0.05). Deadlift 1RM increased in both groups (RPE: +12.3 ± 2.8 kg, %: +10.8 ± 2.0 kg; η 2 = 0.012, p < 0.05). Right hand grip strength increased in the RPE group only (+3.6 ± 1.5 kg, η 2 = 0.026, p < 0.05). Average pretraining session fatigue scores were lower only in the RPE group (RPE: 27.8 ± 1.4, mm: 32.7 ± 1.6 mm, p < 0.05). Body composition remained unchanged in both groups. Taken together, findings indicate RPE-based training elicits comparable strength adaptations to %-based loading while being associated with lower perceived fatigue.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005690
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Rating of Perceived Exertion-based Deadlift Training on Muscle Performance: A Practical Approach to Program Design

Aubrey Newland, Ryan K. Perkins, Nicholas Newton, Alexander D. Young et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effects of Rating of Perceived Exertion-based Deadlift Training on Muscle Performance: A Practical Approach to Program Design

Aubrey Newland, Ryan K. Perkins, Nicholas Newton, Alexander D. Young, Jacob J. Stephan, SangYup Lee, Ashwyn Asthana
article en

Abstract

Abstract Young, AD, Asthana, A, Stephan, JJ, Lee, SY, Newton, NJ, Newland, A, and Perkins, R. Effects of rating of perceived exertion-based deadlift training on muscle performance: A practical approach to program design. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The purpose of this study was to compare rate of perceived exertion (RPE)-based and fixed %-based deadlift training on muscle strength, fatigue, and body composition. We hypothesized that RPE-based training would yield superior adaptations. Subjects were randomly assigned to RPE- or %-based training (RPE: n = 12, 23.6 ± 1.6, %: n = 12, 25.2 ± 2.1 years, d = 0.327, p > 0.05). Training programs used identical set and repetition schemes but differed in load prescription. Maximum deadlift (DL 1RM) primary outcome and hand grip strength and body composition (dual x-ray absorptiometry) secondary outcomes were assessed before and after training. Fatigue estimates were collected throughout the study using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Nine subjects completed the intervention in each group. Data were analyzed using 2-way mixed-model ANOVAs and independent t -tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05 and effect sizes reported. Average DL training volume was similar between groups (RPE: 1,212 ± 159 kg/session, %: 1,338 ± 123 kg/session, d = 0.297, p > 0.05), whereas the % group completed more total training volume (RPE: 2,059 ± 325 kg/session, %: 4,496 ± 582 kg/session, d = 1.715, p < 0.05). Average relative training load was similar between groups (RPE: 82 ± 2% 1 repetition maximum (1RM), %: 80 ± 2% 1RM, d = 0.176, p > 0.05). Deadlift 1RM increased in both groups (RPE: +12.3 ± 2.8 kg, %: +10.8 ± 2.0 kg; η 2 = 0.012, p < 0.05). Right hand grip strength increased in the RPE group only (+3.6 ± 1.5 kg, η 2 = 0.026, p < 0.05). Average pretraining session fatigue scores were lower only in the RPE group (RPE: 27.8 ± 1.4, mm: 32.7 ± 1.6 mm, p < 0.05). Body composition remained unchanged in both groups. Taken together, findings indicate RPE-based training elicits comparable strength adaptations to %-based loading while being associated with lower perceived fatigue.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.