Pre-ECMO characteristics, organ dysfunction and exploratory mortality prediction in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ARDS treated with veno-venous ECMO: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Objective The transferability of pre-ECMO characteristics and established mortality prediction tools across COVID-19 (C-19) and non-COVID-19 (nC-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain. We compared clinical characteristics, organ dysfunction, respiratory support and outcome in a large cohort of patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO), and explored mortality prediction in C-19 ARDS. Methods This retrospective single-center cohort study included n = 600 vvECMO patients (C-19: n = 245, nC-19: n = 355) hospitalized at the Charité ARDS ECMO Center from 01/2007 to 12/2018 (nC-19) and 03/2020–01/2022 (C-19). Pre-ECMO clinical and laboratory variables were compared between cohorts and by ICU survival. RESP score performance was assessed, and an exploratory C-19 ECMO mortality prediction (CEMP) score was derived from pre-ECMO variables using an explainable machine-learning workflow with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results C-19 patients were older (median 57.0 vs. 51.0 years, p < 0.0001), more often male (74.7% vs. 66.8%, p = 0.0337), and had a higher BMI (29.3 vs. 26.0 kg/m², p < 0.0001). nC-19 patients had a higher CCI (3 vs. 2, p = 0.0137) and SOFA score (12 vs. 11, p = 0.0004). Septic shock before vvECMO initiation was more prevalent in nC-19 patients (65.4% vs. 13.9%, p < 0.0001), and nC-19 patients had higher median baseline bilirubin, creatinine, and lactate levels (all p < 0.0001). nC-19 patients had higher median PEEP, pPeak, and plateau pressure than C-19 patients, whereas their PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio was lower ( p < 0.0001). Duration of vvECMO support was longer in C-19 patients (26.0 vs. 12.6 days, p < 0.0001); ICU mortality did not differ significantly (55.1% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.0966). RESP showed limited discrimination in C-19 patients, and the CEMP derivation analysis yielded an apparent AUC of 0.757 (95% CI 0.69–0.82). Conclusion This large single-center comparative vvECMO cohort highlights differences between C-19 and nC-19 ARDS in organ dysfunction burden, respiratory characteristics, and treatment duration. ICU mortality did not differ significantly between groups. RESP showed limited discrimination in C-19; CEMP remains exploratory and requires calibration and independent external validation before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04306-9
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-ECMO characteristics, organ dysfunction and exploratory mortality prediction in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ARDS treated with veno-venous ECMO: a retrospective cohort study

Victoria Bünger, Felix Machleidt, Jan A. Graw, Till Jacobi et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Pre-ECMO characteristics, organ dysfunction and exploratory mortality prediction in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ARDS treated with veno-venous ECMO: a retrospective cohort study

Victoria Bünger, Felix Machleidt, Jan A. Graw, Till Jacobi, Mirja Mittermaier, Daniel Zickler, Alexander Uhrig, Panagiotis Pergantis, Oliver Hunsicker, Micha Landoll, Jan Matthias Kruse, Mario Menk, Claudia Spies, Steffen Weber-Carstens, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Leif-Erik Sander, Michaela Ludmilla Merten, Martin Witzenrath, Holger Müller-Redetzky, Christian Karagiannidis, Johann Lieberwirth, Alexander H. Thieme, Carmen Garcia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The transferability of pre-ECMO characteristics and established mortality prediction tools across COVID-19 (C-19) and non-COVID-19 (nC-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain. We compared clinical characteristics, organ dysfunction, respiratory support and outcome in a large cohort of patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO), and explored mortality prediction in C-19 ARDS. Methods This retrospective single-center cohort study included n = 600 vvECMO patients (C-19: n = 245, nC-19: n = 355) hospitalized at the Charité ARDS ECMO Center from 01/2007 to 12/2018 (nC-19) and 03/2020–01/2022 (C-19). Pre-ECMO clinical and laboratory variables were compared between cohorts and by ICU survival. RESP score performance was assessed, and an exploratory C-19 ECMO mortality prediction (CEMP) score was derived from pre-ECMO variables using an explainable machine-learning workflow with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results C-19 patients were older (median 57.0 vs. 51.0 years, p < 0.0001), more often male (74.7% vs. 66.8%, p = 0.0337), and had a higher BMI (29.3 vs. 26.0 kg/m², p < 0.0001). nC-19 patients had a higher CCI (3 vs. 2, p = 0.0137) and SOFA score (12 vs. 11, p = 0.0004). Septic shock before vvECMO initiation was more prevalent in nC-19 patients (65.4% vs. 13.9%, p < 0.0001), and nC-19 patients had higher median baseline bilirubin, creatinine, and lactate levels (all p < 0.0001). nC-19 patients had higher median PEEP, pPeak, and plateau pressure than C-19 patients, whereas their PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio was lower ( p < 0.0001). Duration of vvECMO support was longer in C-19 patients (26.0 vs. 12.6 days, p < 0.0001); ICU mortality did not differ significantly (55.1% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.0966). RESP showed limited discrimination in C-19 patients, and the CEMP derivation analysis yielded an apparent AUC of 0.757 (95% CI 0.69–0.82). Conclusion This large single-center comparative vvECMO cohort highlights differences between C-19 and nC-19 ARDS in organ dysfunction burden, respiratory characteristics, and treatment duration. ICU mortality did not differ significantly between groups. RESP showed limited discrimination in C-19; CEMP remains exploratory and requires calibration and independent external validation before clinical application.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
Witten/Herdecke University (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Kliniken der Stadt Köln (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), Stanford Medicine (US), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.