Perceptions of Socio-Technological Shifts and Ethical Risks among Next-Generation Emirati IT Specialists: An Empirical Assessment

The accelerating evolution of digital infrastructures and cognitive technologies has fundamentally reshaped contemporary social fabrics; a complex matrix of systemic opportunities and ethical challenges. However, while the socio-economic dividends of automation abound, the swift and uncoordinated spread of these tools poses significant disruptions to traditional socio-cultural norms, ethical paradigms, and long-standing religious values. For highly advanced governmental and judicial technical frameworks in a rapidly growing economy like the United Arab Emirates, this digital transformation happens during a critical transition through legacy infrastructure disparities, often termed the digital divide, that exist in tandem with advanced governmental and judicial technical frameworks. While sophisticated solutions, including automation and artificial intelligence, such as intelligent legal informatics, predictive machine learning, and nuanced digital forensics, play a substantial role in optimizing security frameworks, compliance architectures, and compliance processes, they also introduce new sources of exploitation for automated bias, algorithmic manipulation, and the erasure of cryptographic evidence. At the same time, rampant deepfakes, organized disinformation schemes, and generative AI systems undermine trust, necessitating strict legal and operational scrutiny of content authenticity, platform accountability, and user cognitive health. This paper provides a systematic empirical analysis of next-generation Emirati IT professionals’ levels of awareness about these sociotechnical vectors. Using an extensive questionnaire-level survey given to about 200 upper-level computer information sciences students, our initial empirical results suggest a rather sophisticated awareness baseline. The participants express considerable critical awareness of the structural, ethical, and socio-psychological dangers of these new paradigms and show a strong cultural and occupational capability to imaginatively think, govern, and steer future technologies responsibly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications archive
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37394/23209.2026.23.53
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Socio-Technological Shifts and Ethical Risks among Next-Generation Emirati IT Specialists: An Empirical Assessment

Abdelrahman Altigani, Dimitrios Xanthidis, Ourania K. Xanthidou, Moataz Salhab et al.
WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications archive
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Perceptions of Socio-Technological Shifts and Ethical Risks among Next-Generation Emirati IT Specialists: An Empirical Assessment

Abdelrahman Altigani, Dimitrios Xanthidis, Ourania K. Xanthidou, Moataz Salhab, Anang Judaya Muhamad Amin, Alya Yousef Abdulla Alhammadi
article en

Abstract

The accelerating evolution of digital infrastructures and cognitive technologies has fundamentally reshaped contemporary social fabrics; a complex matrix of systemic opportunities and ethical challenges. However, while the socio-economic dividends of automation abound, the swift and uncoordinated spread of these tools poses significant disruptions to traditional socio-cultural norms, ethical paradigms, and long-standing religious values. For highly advanced governmental and judicial technical frameworks in a rapidly growing economy like the United Arab Emirates, this digital transformation happens during a critical transition through legacy infrastructure disparities, often termed the digital divide, that exist in tandem with advanced governmental and judicial technical frameworks. While sophisticated solutions, including automation and artificial intelligence, such as intelligent legal informatics, predictive machine learning, and nuanced digital forensics, play a substantial role in optimizing security frameworks, compliance architectures, and compliance processes, they also introduce new sources of exploitation for automated bias, algorithmic manipulation, and the erasure of cryptographic evidence. At the same time, rampant deepfakes, organized disinformation schemes, and generative AI systems undermine trust, necessitating strict legal and operational scrutiny of content authenticity, platform accountability, and user cognitive health. This paper provides a systematic empirical analysis of next-generation Emirati IT professionals’ levels of awareness about these sociotechnical vectors. Using an extensive questionnaire-level survey given to about 200 upper-level computer information sciences students, our initial empirical results suggest a rather sophisticated awareness baseline. The participants express considerable critical awareness of the structural, ethical, and socio-psychological dangers of these new paradigms and show a strong cultural and occupational capability to imaginatively think, govern, and steer future technologies responsibly.

WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications archiveVol. 23
Higher Colleges of Technology (AE), Brunel University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.