Phenotype‐Based Risk Stratification in Patients With New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following Myocardial Infarction Using a Data‐Driven Approach

ABSTRACT Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, yet existing risk stratification tools perform poorly in this population. Conventional predictors fail to capture multidimensional risk, while data‐driven approaches may identify latent phenotypes with improved prognostic value. Aims We sought to identify phenotypes of new‐onset AF after MI using principal component analysis (PCA), evaluate their association with adverse outcomes, and develop a simple decision‐tree model for clinical risk stratification. Methods We analyzed 451 patients with new‐onset AF after MI. PCA identified low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk phenogroups. The primary endpoint was 3‐year mortality, stroke, or MACE. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox models assessed outcomes. Decision trees predicted phenogroup membership, with angiographic features compared across risk tiers. Results PCA identified three phenogroups (low, intermediate, high risk) driven mainly by LVESV, LVEDV, LVEF, sex, and CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc. Clusters showed clear separation on PCA mapping. Event‐free survival differed significantly across groups (log‐rank p < 0.0001), with the lowest survival in the high‐risk cluster. After multivariable adjustment for clinical risk factors, phenogroups remained independently associated with adverse outcomes. A simplified decision tree using LVEF, CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc, LVEDV, age, and TR Vmax predicted risk with 72.3% accuracy, supporting bedside risk stratification in post‐MI AF patient populations. Conclusion Phenomapping identified three distinct AF risk groups with different clinical outcomes. LV size and function were the strongest contributors to phenotypic separation. The decision tree offered a clear, accurate, and interpretable framework that supports a new strategy for identifying appropriate patients with AF after MI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70923
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenotype‐Based Risk Stratification in Patients With New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following Myocardial Infarction Using a Data‐Driven Approach

Krutarth Pandya, Grant William Reed, Shivabalan Kathavarayan Ramu, Taha Hatab et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Phenotype‐Based Risk Stratification in Patients With New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following Myocardial Infarction Using a Data‐Driven Approach

Krutarth Pandya, Grant William Reed, Shivabalan Kathavarayan Ramu, Taha Hatab, Jacqueline E. Tamis‐Holland, Carl Ammoury, Vaidehi Mendpara, Sada babazade, Besir Besir, Tamari Lomaia, Alexander Egoavil, Khaled Ziada, Oussama Wazni, Akhilesh Khuttan, Samir Kapadia, Judah Rajendran, Venu Menon
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, yet existing risk stratification tools perform poorly in this population. Conventional predictors fail to capture multidimensional risk, while data‐driven approaches may identify latent phenotypes with improved prognostic value. Aims We sought to identify phenotypes of new‐onset AF after MI using principal component analysis (PCA), evaluate their association with adverse outcomes, and develop a simple decision‐tree model for clinical risk stratification. Methods We analyzed 451 patients with new‐onset AF after MI. PCA identified low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk phenogroups. The primary endpoint was 3‐year mortality, stroke, or MACE. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox models assessed outcomes. Decision trees predicted phenogroup membership, with angiographic features compared across risk tiers. Results PCA identified three phenogroups (low, intermediate, high risk) driven mainly by LVESV, LVEDV, LVEF, sex, and CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc. Clusters showed clear separation on PCA mapping. Event‐free survival differed significantly across groups (log‐rank p < 0.0001), with the lowest survival in the high‐risk cluster. After multivariable adjustment for clinical risk factors, phenogroups remained independently associated with adverse outcomes. A simplified decision tree using LVEF, CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc, LVEDV, age, and TR Vmax predicted risk with 72.3% accuracy, supporting bedside risk stratification in post‐MI AF patient populations. Conclusion Phenomapping identified three distinct AF risk groups with different clinical outcomes. LV size and function were the strongest contributors to phenotypic separation. The decision tree offered a clear, accurate, and interpretable framework that supports a new strategy for identifying appropriate patients with AF after MI.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.