Operationalizing resilience for sustainable infrastructure governance across the life cycle

Abstract Sustainability and resilience expectations for infrastructure are escalating faster than the regulatory frameworks meant to deliver them. This mismatch is most acute for ageing critical infrastructure. Yet, adaptation decisions remain fragmented because resilience and sustainability operate on fundamentally different temporal domains: resilience captures short-term recovery dynamics and service continuity. Instead, sustainability evaluates long-term impacts across their life cycle. Here, we depart from this temporally disjoined approach. Instead of analysing trade-offs between resilience and sustainability metrics separately, we introduce a unified decision-oriented framework that integrates short-term recovery dynamics, representing resilience, with long-term life-cycle performance, expressing sustainability, within a common optimisation structure that links these temporal dimensions. We formulate resilience as a recovery-based variable linked to retrofit implementation and integrate it with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Cost (LCC), and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support infrastructure decision-making across the life cycle. To the best of our knowledge, existing decision frameworks have not explicitly integrated resilience and sustainability across these temporal domains within a unified optimisation framework. Applied to a landmark ageing bridge, the framework evaluates six adaptation strategies under competing resilience, cost, carbon, and longevity objectives. Our results show that system level transformation with limited structural intervention can outperform conventional strategies, achieving stronger tradeoffs across resilience, environmental impact, cost, and service life extension. These findings provide actionable evidence for extending the lifespan of ageing infrastructure, while reducing environmental footprints. Thus, they offer a scalable pathway for aligning infrastructure adaptation with sustainability and resilience objectives under real-world constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Engineering
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00794-2
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalizing resilience for sustainable infrastructure governance across the life cycle

Sotirios A. Argyroudis, Marco Domaneschi, Roberta Di Bari, Nadiia Kopiika et al.
Communications Engineering
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Operationalizing resilience for sustainable infrastructure governance across the life cycle

Sotirios A. Argyroudis, Marco Domaneschi, Roberta Di Bari, Nadiia Kopiika, Paola Cavallaro, Valentina Villa, Stergios-Aristoteles Mitoulis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sustainability and resilience expectations for infrastructure are escalating faster than the regulatory frameworks meant to deliver them. This mismatch is most acute for ageing critical infrastructure. Yet, adaptation decisions remain fragmented because resilience and sustainability operate on fundamentally different temporal domains: resilience captures short-term recovery dynamics and service continuity. Instead, sustainability evaluates long-term impacts across their life cycle. Here, we depart from this temporally disjoined approach. Instead of analysing trade-offs between resilience and sustainability metrics separately, we introduce a unified decision-oriented framework that integrates short-term recovery dynamics, representing resilience, with long-term life-cycle performance, expressing sustainability, within a common optimisation structure that links these temporal dimensions. We formulate resilience as a recovery-based variable linked to retrofit implementation and integrate it with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Cost (LCC), and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support infrastructure decision-making across the life cycle. To the best of our knowledge, existing decision frameworks have not explicitly integrated resilience and sustainability across these temporal domains within a unified optimisation framework. Applied to a landmark ageing bridge, the framework evaluates six adaptation strategies under competing resilience, cost, carbon, and longevity objectives. Our results show that system level transformation with limited structural intervention can outperform conventional strategies, achieving stronger tradeoffs across resilience, environmental impact, cost, and service life extension. These findings provide actionable evidence for extending the lifespan of ageing infrastructure, while reducing environmental footprints. Thus, they offer a scalable pathway for aligning infrastructure adaptation with sustainability and resilience objectives under real-world constraints.

Communications Engineering
Politecnico di Torino (IT), University College London (GB), Brunel University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.