The ecosystem services gap in tourism research: From harm minimization to benefit recognition

Tourism research has long framed the natural environment as a fragile asset requiring protection from tourism-induced harm — generating important insights into impact mitigation, but producing a blind spot: the measurable benefits that ecosystems provide to tourism remain largely unrecognized. This research note documents an ecosystem services gap — the disconnect between the ecosystem services (ES) framework, now central to environmental science and policy, and its near-absence from tourism journals. Drawing on bibliometric evidence, structured literature review, and proof-of-concept examples from ES valuation research, I argue that closing this gap is both analytically necessary and practically urgent. Reframing ecosystems as productive assets rather than passive constraints would strengthen welfare-based arguments for conservation investment and open new avenues for tourism demand modeling and policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tourism Economics
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166261496335
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ecosystem services gap in tourism research: From harm minimization to benefit recognition

Aliza Fleischer
Tourism Economics
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

The ecosystem services gap in tourism research: From harm minimization to benefit recognition

Aliza Fleischer
article en

Abstract

Tourism research has long framed the natural environment as a fragile asset requiring protection from tourism-induced harm — generating important insights into impact mitigation, but producing a blind spot: the measurable benefits that ecosystems provide to tourism remain largely unrecognized. This research note documents an ecosystem services gap — the disconnect between the ecosystem services (ES) framework, now central to environmental science and policy, and its near-absence from tourism journals. Drawing on bibliometric evidence, structured literature review, and proof-of-concept examples from ES valuation research, I argue that closing this gap is both analytically necessary and practically urgent. Reframing ecosystems as productive assets rather than passive constraints would strengthen welfare-based arguments for conservation investment and open new avenues for tourism demand modeling and policy design.

Tourism Economics
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.